FT: DERBY COUNTY 0 - 1 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

[dml1954]

I simply asked a question as to the reason why he was subbed....what is wrong with that?

Trouble is, you didn't do that did you. I would read your post again if I were you. Trying to be clever.

[Maurice Swan]

Trouble is, you didn't do that did you. I would read your post again if I were you. Trying to be clever.

Ummm.....here is my question as posted...:

"Why has he subbed the sub Isaak Davies after 15 minutes on the field? Was he injured or does SM think he's a hindrance?

Is that not a question?....two in fact - perfectly legitimate.

I'll not reply to any further comments on this - I am sure others can judge the right to ask.

[logic]

Trouble is, you didn't do that did you. I would read your post again if I were you. Trying to be clever.

Logic indicates that questions were asked.

"Why has he subbed the sub Isaak Davies after 15 minutes on the field?" - question regarding the substitution of the sub.
"Was he injured or does SM think he's a hindrance?" - question regarding the rationale behind the substitution, using a previous example of similar happening.

"Really bad management if not injured....to do this again." - an opinion.

Logic therefore indicates the overall tone of the post was questioning the substitution of Davies with an opinion predicated upon one possible reason.

[dml1954]

Logic indicates that questions were asked.

"Why has he subbed the sub Isaak Davies after 15 minutes on the field?" - question regarding the substitution of the sub.
"Was he injured or does SM think he's a hindrance?" - question regarding the rationale behind the substitution, using a previous example of similar happening.

"Really bad management if not injured....to do this again." - an opinion.

Logic therefore indicates the overall tone of the post was questioning the substitution of Davies with an opinion predicated upon one possible reason.

Logic would indicate that before you comment on two other peoples posts, you should at least read them. He wasn't just asking if Davies was injured when he was taken off, he was speculating, conjecturing and giving his opinion on the situation (based on no information at all), as you yourself have stated.

[logic]

Logic would indicate that before you comment on two other peoples posts, you should at least read them. He wasn't just asking if Davies was injured when he was taken off, he was speculating, conjecturing and giving his opinion on the situation (based on no information at all), as you yourself have stated.

Logic indicates the posts were read given the detailed response.

Indeed, if you'd actually read my post, you'd have determined the opinion was predicated on one outcome arising from a possible response to a question; a question pertinent given Morison having already subbed off Davies as sub once before this season.

Logic indicates that through analysis of your posts, you seem to be, as the hip kids would say, butthurt at anything you deem to be criticism of the club or manager, whoever that may be at the time.