Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
I'm not sure that's the type of nuanced debate that happens here. There's none of that in this thread.

It's more the "if 99% of scientists say it's real, that's because they're being paid to say it". Why should anyone just move on from that and leave it unchallenged? I don't see how that's best.
Yeah I agree. I have no time for the conspiracy theories on it - present the evidence at least.

But there are some unhelpful opinions associated with the climate debate on the 'green' side too, which probably fuels a bit of it all by not understanding some of the more legitimate nuanced issues or how some of what they propose will effect peoples lives.

The politics and hypocrisy of it all can grate too.