England’s first ever red warning for extreme heat on Monday and Tuesday.

[Rjk]

Shouldn't there be a 'not' in there somewhere?

I want him - if he can to summarize what he thinks the case for man made climate change is and why he isn't convinced by it.

I guarantee he hasn't understood the case for it.

[xsnaggle]

I want him - if he can to summarize what he thinks the case for man made climate change is and why he isn't convinced by it.

I guarantee he hasn't understood the case for it.

To be fir he probably didn't understand the question.

[The Lone Gunman]

I don't doubt we are entering a warmer period in the cycle. The question is whether the warming is induced by man.

The answer is yes according to the experts.

[A Quiet Monkfish]

The answer is yes according to the experts.

The trouble with 'experts' is they know a significant percentage of folk will believe whatever the say because they're 'experts'. Hence they come up will anything that suits their narrative, safe in the knowledge they won't be challenged.

[TWGL1]

1D63D660-FE7D-4D34-B27F-E2B0DE0573A3.jpg

The trouble with 'experts' is they know a significant percentage of folk will believe whatever the say because they're 'experts'. Hence they come up will anything that suits their narrative, safe in the knowledge they won't be challenged.

[The Lone Gunman]

You’re weird.

[The Bloop]

I don't doubt we are entering a warmer period in the cycle. The question is whether the warming is induced by man.

I'll summarise for you - yes it is.

[rudy gestede]

From the links you provided. It's not 99% of scientists but 99% of those funded to do peer reviewed papers.
Radio 4 today reported that the majority of scientists agree that climate change is man made. I wonder why they didn't use the 99%?

What do you mean funded to do peer reviewed papers?

[rudy gestede]

The trouble with 'experts' is they know a significant percentage of folk will believe whatever the say because they're 'experts'. Hence they come up will anything that suits their narrative, safe in the knowledge they won't be challenged.

Challenge them then, what do you challenge them on?

[rudy gestede]

I'll summarise for you - yes it is.

There couldn’t be more proof of something.

If people don’t believe it they haven’t seen the evidence. It can all be found in the unedited form, completely unbiased.

[The Lone Gunman]

The trouble with 'experts' is they know a significant percentage of folk will believe whatever the say because they're 'experts'. Hence they come up will anything that suits their narrative, safe in the knowledge they won't be challenged.

So these experts, and it seems there are a great many of them - what is it you believe they all have to gain by claiming global warming is a result of human actions if that isn’t the case?

This is something that puzzles me.

[Baloo]

The trouble with 'experts' is they know a significant percentage of folk will believe whatever the say because they're 'experts'. Hence they come up will anything that suits their narrative, safe in the knowledge they won't be challenged.

The peer reviewed scientific papers appear in almost complete agreement. These are hardly people likely to be overawed by ‘experts’. It’s actually mostly the general public who appear to know better.

[rudy gestede]

1D63D660-FE7D-4D34-B27F-E2B0DE0573A3.jpg

Who are they published by? Half on them weren’t even wrong ffs.


There is a reason the ozone isn’t gone, the reaction to it.

There’s a reason acid rain doesn’t exist in such large amounts, it’s because of the reaction to it.

The ice cans have massively reduced in size.

[rudy gestede]

What’s funny is people will say it’s spread by the “main stream media” when you can always find the original sources used in their stories and check them yourself. ****ing donuts.

[Doucas]

1D63D660-FE7D-4D34-B27F-E2B0DE0573A3.jpg

You do realise the o zone issue at that time was solved because people took it seriously and governments acted yeah?

[TWGL1]

You do realise the o zone issue at that time was solved because people took it seriously and governments acted yeah?

Of course ..don’t be so gullible, but for balance , I hardly thought “checkmate” when I read it.

We have been fed fear for years that’s for sure

[rudy gestede]

All resulted in more taxes how stupid do you have to be to read that and think “check mate!”

[The Bloop]

A while back someone on this board claimed that a collection of stars in the shape of a cross was evidence of God. If this screenshot has been provided as proof that climate change is not man-made, its just as ludicrous.

[TWGL1]

Here another one from 1974 72A60469-872D-4F19-B3A5-DBE5F741D0AC.jpg

[The Lone Gunman]

We have been fed fear for years that’s for sure

By who?

[blue matt]

well it was forecast 38 C here, only hit 35 C, I feel a little disappointed to be honest, I wanted a " Tell my grandkids about when it hit 38 C in the summer of 22 "

Damm you Climate change, you have let me down

[Baloo]

well it was forecast 38 C here, only hit 35 C, I feel a little disappointed to be honest, I wanted a " Tell my grandkids about when it hit 38 C in the summer of 22 "

Damm you Climate change, you have let me down

To cheer you up Matt it was the hottest day on record in Wales today at 37.1 in Hawarden. The record might tumble again tomorrow.

[TWGL1]

It hardly a load of crap and who mentioned chemtrails ?

Australian government documents here if you’re interested

https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary...port/chap7.pdf

[jeepster]

It hardly a load of crap and who mentioned chemtrails ?

Australian government documents here if you’re interested

https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary...port/chap7.pdf

Becuase is all related in your post

[Citizen's Nephew]

6n62eu.jpg