England’s first ever red warning for extreme heat on Monday and Tuesday.

[blue matt]

Snowflake who thinks disagreement is a snide remark

yea, of course

[life on mars]

not what I meant at all, if you were in the pub and you shouted some snidey abuse to someone, you know what the outcome might be

so you wouldn't do it, so no need to act like that on a message board, its fairly simple

Made the same comment many times and your dead right , easy to be a tough or rude via a keyboard ,face to face would be different ..

All the best pubs I /I've frequented are the edgy ones.. no poshness ,crappie seats , ,loads f character, where folk generally behave ,okay to have a laugh any unwarranted rudeness is usually dealt with....

[Harry Paget Flashman]

A good rule for message boards, act like you would in a pub with the same people, if you made some snidey remark you would expect to be pulled up on it and maybe given a slap, so you wouldn't do it,

I’ve not seen anyone challenged to a fight up in Beddau for years to be fair.

[bluesp]

This thread seems to have drifted off topic slightly……

[rudy gestede]

He doesn’t , he just has a different opinion to most and in particular you , hope that helps

Yeah and then he thinks everyone is arguing when someone disagrees with it

The right wingers again using and falling for the old trick that everyone that disagrees with them is as snowflake and a bully all at once.

When people have “opinions” that aren’t based in fact they should expect them to be questioned not cry about “arguing”.

If all he wants to do is talk about Cardiff city why not just stick to football threads?

[TWGL1]

Yeah and then he thinks everyone is arguing when someone disagrees with it

The right wingers again using and falling for the old trick that everyone that disagrees with them is as snowflake and a bully all at once.

Right winger WTF are you on about ?

[rudy gestede]

The clue is 'man-made'. Who knows ? If it rains, its CC. If it snows, it's CC. If it's hot or cold, it's CC. If it's Windy it's CC. They used to bang on about the 'hole in the ozone layer'. Remember that ? Then it vanished and they had to find something else to get stressed out about.

Posting nonsense like this then crying about people arguing is about as ironic as you can get.

The hole in the ozone layer stabilised after CFCs were deemed to be causing it and there was a massive global effort to ban them.

[rudy gestede]

Right winger WTF are you on about ?

People who have right leaning political views. I wasn’t talking about you btw, I don’t know who you are tbh, go back and read it again and you can see it’s about people crying about “arguing”.

[TWGL1]

Yeah and then he thinks everyone is arguing when someone disagrees with it

The right wingers again using and falling for the old trick that everyone that disagrees with them is as snowflake and a bully all at once.

When people have “opinions” that aren’t based in fact they should expect them to be questioned not cry about “arguing”.

If all he wants to do is talk about Cardiff city why not just stick to football threads?

Posting nonsense like this then crying about people arguing is about as ironic as you can get.

The hole in the ozone layer stabilised after CFCs were deemed to be causing it and there was a massive global effort to ban them.

Hole in the Ozone layer …hmmmm

[rudy gestede]

Hole in the Ozone layer …hmmmm

What do you mean mate

[TWGL1]

Yeah and then he thinks everyone is arguing when someone disagrees with it

The right wingers again using and falling for the old trick that everyone that disagrees with them is as snowflake and a bully all at once.

When people have “opinions” that aren’t based in fact they should expect them to be questioned not cry about “arguing”.

If all he wants to do is talk about Cardiff city why not just stick to football threads?

Posting nonsense like this then crying about people arguing is about as ironic as you can get.

The hole in the ozone layer stabilised after CFCs were deemed to be causing it and there was a massive global effort to ban them.

[QUOTE=rudy gestede;5323664]What do you mean

I don’t think the measures you have mentioned has had any impact regardless of what’s reported, but then again I’ve always questioned things and don’t take things as face value. That’s obvious from things I post

[A Quiet Monkfish]

[QUOTE=TWGL1;5323667]

What do you mean

I don’t think the measures you have mentioned has had any impact regardless of what’s reported, but then again I’ve always questioned things and don’t take things as face value. That’s obvious from things I post

The ozone layer in 2021 was one of the largest since records began. It fluctuates as it's influenced by several stratospheric and solar events - much like climate change itself..

[rudy gestede]

There’s so much evidence out there proving it. What are you basing your opinion on? Genuinely interested.

Do you think there was never a hole in the ozone?

Seriously I work in a job where we have to base how we design things of extreme weather and space weather and stuff like this drives the design. Do you think massive engineering projects use information from stuff that isn’t real?

I’m not taking things purely off what I read in newspapers, there is so much data and information out there that shows it to be true.

[rudy gestede]

[QUOTE=A Quiet Monkfish;5323670]

The ozone layer in 2021 was one of the largest since records began. It fluctuates as it's influenced by several stratospheric and solar events - much like climate change itself..

It does fluctuate yes but it was genuinely expanding rapidly prior to the ban on CFCs.

Much like climate change it has natural things affecting it and man made things affecting it and conflating them just to try and prove a point is pretty short sighted and reductive.

[A Quiet Monkfish]

[QUOTE=rudy gestede;5323672]

It does fluctuate yes but it was genuinely expanding rapidly prior to the ban on CFCs.

Much like climate change it has natural things affecting it and man made things affecting it and conflating them just to try and prove a point is pretty short sighted and reductive.

Ah, I'm short sighted and reductive as well now.

[rudy gestede]

You’d make a good politician though

I said the argument was short sighted and reductive, don’t take anyone questioning your opinion as an insult.

[Lither_1927]

A wind up? All you have to do is look at the posters that piss over almost every thread on this board to see that there are people here that are not really here for community of any sort, to talk about Cardiff City or even have a discussion without inserting an aggressive and extreme agenda.

I found you very rude and absusive to me on atleast one occasion. I'm not complaining, just pointing out your hypocritical position.

[Lither_1927]

You’d make a good politician though

I said the argument was short sighted and reductive, don’t take anyone questioning your opinion as an insult.

What did you think of that article i posted further back.The Science industry told millions to take anti depressants. Now they're saying there's no solid basis for it. So what happened to your peer review backstop ensuring flawed studies get exsposed? Only took 40 years and numerous lives ruined because people who trusted the sCiEnCe

[blue matt]

What did you think of that article i posted further back.The Science industry told millions to take anti depressants. Now they're saying there's no solid basis for it. So what happened to your peer review backstop ensuring flawed studies get exsposed? Only took 40 years and numerous lives ruined because people who trusted the sCiEnCe

forget about that, this is the question you should be asking

why do people use Multi accounts to reply to themselves ( for example, Croesy Blue quoting and replying to himself as Rudy Gestede and visa versa, thats the answer the board is waiting for

[cyril evans awaydays]

forget about that, this is the question you should be asking

why do people use Multi accounts to reply to themselves ( for example, Croesy Blue quoting and replying to himself as Rudy Gestede and visa versa, thats the answer the board is waiting for

I guess as a moderator you have the ability to spot that kind of stuff. Any other examples?

[blue matt]

I guess as a moderator you have the ability to spot that kind of stuff. Any other examples?

A few can normally spot them, I know that JK did right at the start, I dont like to spoil the fun normally, if they are not causing issues and posting decently then no harm imho, but I occasionally get a private message ( or text ) to say " is that so-and-so posting as XYZ " I guess its a knack some have to spot them, as I said previously, they normally start posting as a different persona from the main account, but soon enough slip back into what they are or they follow a similar pattern of posts, of course, not many quote something with the same account thats posted and post as a different person, thats just silly

[cyril evans awaydays]

A few can normally spot them, I know that JK did right at the start, I dont like to spoil the fun normally, if they are not causing issues and posting decently then no harm imho, but I occasionally get a private message ( or text ) to say " is that so-and-so posting as XYZ " I guess its a knack some have to spot them, as I said previously, they normally start posting as a different persona from the main account, but soon enough slip back into what they are or they follow a similar pattern of posts, of course, not many quote something with the same account thats posted and post as a different person, thats just silly

So, just so I understand, when you said" forget about that, this is the question you should be asking why do people use Multi accounts to reply to themselves ( for example, Croesy Blue quoting and replying to himself as Rudy Gestede and visa versa, that's the answer the board is waiting for" you know the answer?

And if so, why are you singling Croesy blue/Rudy out?

[Citizen's Nephew]

What did you think of that article i posted further back.The Science industry told millions to take anti depressants. Now they're saying there's no solid basis for it. So what happened to your peer review backstop ensuring flawed studies get exsposed? Only took 40 years and numerous lives ruined because people who trusted the sCiEnCe

I don't really want to engage but this is complete bollox. I don't mind admitting that I regularly need to take antidepressants and they have saved more lives than they've damaged. I get sick of this false narrative that medication is a problem. Finding the right treatment is a problem, over-prescribing is a problem and misinformation is a problem. The stuff your spouting is dangerous. Respectfully, give it a f*cking rest and find some purpose in your life mate. This can't be doing you any good.

[The Lone Gunman]

I think on any forum you have to have faith and trust in the people who moderate the board. Regardless of the Rudy sniping tonight you seem happy to allow people like Goslow and Lither spread their poison. A few decent posters have left the board in the last couple of years and I am adding my name to that list.

Please don’t do that. This board is an absolute cesspit these days, no doubt about that, and the fact that Blue Matt is a moderator speaks volumes. However, some of the football discussion is still decent and there are plenty of good people still using this forum.

Don’t let the fools drive you away. Your posts are appreciated by many of us, I’m sure.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Your posts are appreciated by many of us, I’m sure.

They most certainly are.