+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 201

Thread: Lamouchi gone

  1. #176

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Father Dougal View Post
    Why are you obsessed with trying to prove a point that nobody has even argued?

    I said we were shocking in our last 2 performances and in our last 4 home performances. We were. That's not saying Lamouchi was shocking.
    You saying that we were shocking under lamouchi .....is being used here with regard to him as a manager .....that being ...his team were shocking ......thus he's a shocking manager

    What other conclusion is there ?

  2. #177

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff View Post
    According to WOL

    :-/
    All bickering aside, does anyone think that the club will appoint a manager who is better than Lamouchi, whatever you think of him?

    On the evidence of the last few years I have almost zero confidence that they will and fully expect another cheap, uninspiring, unimaginative appointment who with enthuse absolutely no one including the players.

    I really hope that I’m wrong but nearly all of the recent evidence suggests otherwise.
    Last edited by Bobby Dandruff; 16-05-23 at 22:27. Reason: Grammar

  3. #178

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff View Post
    All bickering aside, does anyone think that the club will appoint a manager who is better than Lamouchi, whatever you think of him?

    On the evidence of the last few years I have almost zero confidence that they will and fully expect another cheap, uninspiring, unimaginative appointment who with enthuse absolutely no one including the players.

    I really hope that I’m wrong but nearly all of the recent evidence suggests otherwise.
    I'll tilt that on its head a bit - will the club appoint a manager better than Hudson? Statistically, there's little to choose between them.

  4. #179

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    I'll tilt that on its head a bit - will the club appoint a manager better than Hudson? Statistically, there's little to choose between them.
    Yeah I see that.

    However, for some reason that I can’t put my finger on Lamouchi gave me some form of hope that I last remember experiencing when Warnock was appointed.

    Pretty much every other managerial appointment since Malky, bar the two mentioned above, has left me utterly indifferent, and that is being charitable. (I’d never even heard of Slade before)

  5. #180

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff View Post
    Yeah I see that.

    However, for some reason that I can’t put my finger on Lamouchi gave me some form of hope that I last remember experiencing when Warnock was appointed.

    Pretty much every other managerial appointment since Malky, bar the two mentioned above, has left me utterly indifferent, and that is being charitable. (I’d never even heard of Slade before)
    Sabri never went on a 9 game winless run...

    Hudson was a dreadful manager.

  6. #181

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
    All the pre noise from Dalman and Lamouchi indicated that there the club and manager wanted to do a deal. That's why I'm deeply sceptical when they said money was not discussed. I can't help thinking that's the reason the situation broke down
    It would seem that way wouldn’t it. One of the reasons I’ve a bit more sympathy for Morison than many is that Tan and the hierarchy of the club expected a top six challenge and a complete change of playing style on the back of a budget which was not tiny, but was, reportedly, in the lowest quarter of the Championship when it came to wages. We really do need more realism in the Boardroom if our budget is to be reduced further.

  7. #182

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
    All the pre noise from Dalman and Lamouchi indicated that there the club and manager wanted to do a deal. That's why I'm deeply sceptical when they said money was not discussed. I can't help thinking that's the reason the situation broke down
    You may be correct. However, Tan is something of an imponderable. He didn’t sack Morison or Hudson over money. My belief is that, like the two managers who went before him, Lamouchi was binned because the team’s performances didn’t match Tan’s expectations while under his guidance.

    Whether those expectations were realistic or not is open to debate, but I think that’s what’s happened. I reckon Tan believed Lamouchi would do better than he actually did, and therefore called it a day. There’s every chance I’m wrong and it was down to money, but that’s my gut feeling.

  8. #183

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    You may be correct. However, Tan is something of an imponderable. He didn’t sack Morison or Hudson over money. My belief is that, like the two managers who went before him, Lamouchi was binned because the team’s performances didn’t match Tan’s expectations while under his guidance.

    Whether those expectations were realistic or not is open to debate, but I think that’s what’s happened. I reckon Tan believed Lamouchi would do better than he actually did, and therefore called it a day. There’s every chance I’m wrong and it was down to money, but that’s my gut feeling.
    Interesting point. Didn't Dalman claim last season that we could finish in the top 6? Whether that was also the words of Vincent Tan, who knows, but if the chair and owner thought the playing personnel of last season was much better than a 21st place finish, they're a pair of imbeciles.

  9. #184

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    It would seem that way wouldn’t it. One of the reasons I’ve a bit more sympathy for Morison than many is that Tan and the hierarchy of the club expected a top six challenge and a complete change of playing style on the back of a budget which was not tiny, but was, reportedly, in the lowest quarter of the Championship when it came to wages. We really do need more realism in the Boardroom if our budget is to be reduced further.
    Steve Moneyball Morison and his dossiers sold Tan a dream

  10. #185

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Contrary to what you seem to believe, Vincent Tan is not 'the club'. He just owns it. For now.

    As I recall, the Chairman seemed enthusiastic about the prospect of Lamouchi staying. When asked recently if the manager would be staying, he said: "I think so. I have no reason to believe he has different thoughts than us."

    The problem for Dalman is that, once again, it seems 'us' didn't include Tan. The Chairman and the owner rarely seem to be on the same page these days, which should be a concern to any City fan.
    Quote Originally Posted by bigjoe View Post
    Steve Moneyball Morison and his dossiers sold Tan a dream
    Well the other forum board, if they are to be believed, have had three names given to them one of which is Morison!!

  11. #186

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Nobody's Rep View Post
    Well the other forum board, if they are to be believed, have had three names given to them one of which is Morison!!
    that would be hilarious tbf

  12. #187

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Is it possible that Lamouchi had other irons in the fire, though? Just because the club say that they aren’t going forward with him, doesn’t necessarily make it so.
    We can’t believe a word they say these days.

  13. #188

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    You may be correct. However, Tan is something of an imponderable. He didn’t sack Morison or Hudson over money. My belief is that, like the two managers who went before him, Lamouchi was binned because the team’s performances didn’t match Tan’s expectations while under his guidance.

    Whether those expectations were realistic or not is open to debate, but I think that’s what’s happened. I reckon Tan believed Lamouchi would do better than he actually did, and therefore called it a day. There’s every chance I’m wrong and it was down to money, but that’s my gut feeling.
    And if tan did think that there is an argument for saying that's fair enough as everyone knows so little difference in records between sabri hudson and morison.

    However the difficulty is its 17th May today. Championship safety was mathematically assured on the 29th April. Why such a delay? That's what makes me think at least some talks must have been had.

  14. #189

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Nobody's Rep View Post
    Well the other forum board, if they are to be believed, have had three names given to them one of which is Morison!!
    Morison.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  15. #190

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Interesting point. Didn't Dalman claim last season that we could finish in the top 6? Whether that was also the words of Vincent Tan, who knows, but if the chair and owner thought the playing personnel of last season was much better than a 21st place finish, they're a pair of imbeciles.
    Tan said it this season too https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/...-city-25469143

  16. #191

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    Morison.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    But they say the info is from one contact in the club about one of the names and one from the another club who is employing one of the other names and then there is the third one they list as being the 3 names that are being spoken to - what's not to believe

    Cynics everywhere 🙄

  17. #192

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Overtaken by events it seems.

    https://mauveandyellowarmy.net/

  18. #193

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff View Post
    According to WOL

    :-/
    Lamouchi is a decent manager dealing with loads of cast-off players In his time at Nottingham Forest he did a Decent job and Kept them high with a promotion chance THEN there was a parting with Copper MAN taking over
    I'm done with this merry-go-round.

    .
    What has Tan done?

  19. #194

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    You may be correct. However, Tan is something of an imponderable. He didn’t sack Morison or Hudson over money. My belief is that, like the two managers who went before him, Lamouchi was binned because the team’s performances didn’t match Tan’s expectations while under his guidance.

    Whether those expectations were realistic or not is open to debate, but I think that’s what’s happened. I reckon Tan believed Lamouchi would do better than he actually did, and therefore called it a day. There’s every chance I’m wrong and it was down to money, but that’s my gut feeling.
    Both of us maybe right. Over a decade in the game and he's learned nothing

  20. #195

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    It would seem that way wouldn’t it. One of the reasons I’ve a bit more sympathy for Morison than many is that Tan and the hierarchy of the club expected a top six challenge and a complete change of playing style on the back of a budget which was not tiny, but was, reportedly, in the lowest quarter of the Championship when it came to wages. We really do need more realism in the Boardroom if our budget is to be reduced further.
    I struggle to believe that considering the number of players in our first-team squad.

  21. #196
    International
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    North Cardiff ha ha
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff View Post
    According to WOL

    :-/
    Please take Tan with him ffs

  22. #197
    International
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    North Cardiff ha ha
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    You may be correct. However, Tan is something of an imponderable. He didn’t sack Morison or Hudson over money. My belief is that, like the two managers who went before him, Lamouchi was binned because the team’s performances didn’t match Tan’s expectations while under his guidance.

    Whether those expectations were realistic or not is open to debate, but I think that’s what’s happened. I reckon Tan believed Lamouchi would do better than he actually did, and therefore called it a day. There’s every chance I’m wrong and it was down to money, but that’s my gut feeling.
    That makes perfect sense, that's my take on it, only one problem he doesn't have a clue!

  23. #198
    International
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    North Cardiff ha ha
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by ivorall View Post
    Lamouchi is a decent manager dealing with loads of cast-off players In his time at Nottingham Forest he did a Decent job and Kept them high with a promotion chance THEN there was a parting with Copper MAN taking over
    I'm done with this merry-go-round.

    .
    What has Tan done?
    Lost the plot completely if he's given it to Bamba after all his other gambles with giving the Manager job to coaches that just feck it up.

  24. #199

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Nobody's Rep View Post
    Well the other forum board, if they are to be believed, have had three names given to them one of which is Morison!!
    Didn't AA say Lamouchi got the gig only a few days back? 🤣

  25. #200

    Re: Lamouchi gone

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Interesting point. Didn't Dalman claim last season that we could finish in the top 6?
    Don't recall him saying that. On the contrary, when he did that podcast at the start of last season, the host suggested that a mid-table finish would be a successful season given the major overhaul the squad had been given. Dalman said he agreed, but added that he was in a minority of one in City's boardroom.

    That comment stood out to me at the time as it was another clear indication that the chairman and the owner are not on the same page these days.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •