+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 87

Thread: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

  1. #1

    Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    God bless them judges

  2. #2

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Yeah but when are we gonna sign some players like?

  3. #3

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    God bless them judges
    Easy to say from Cowbridge eh.

    Interesting that the Rwandan govt have strongly criticised the decision? Bit of old school imperialist racism from these elderly Oxbridge judges perhaps?

  4. #4

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    Easy to say from Cowbridge eh.

    Interesting that the Rwandan govt have strongly criticised the decision? Bit of old school imperialist racism from these elderly Oxbridge judges perhaps?
    What's where I currently live got to do with my views that this current govt are a bunch of chancers , propped up by the likes of you ?

  5. #5

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by David Lemma View Post
    Yeah but when are we gonna sign some players like?
    No one is interested

    The message board has ground to a halt

  6. #6

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    Interesting that the Rwandan govt have strongly criticised the decision? Bit of old school imperialist racism from these elderly Oxbridge judges perhaps?
    The decision that says that the UK shouldn't pay them over £100k a person to receive people ?
    What's their problem?

  7. #7

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    Easy to say from Cowbridge eh.

    Interesting that the Rwandan govt have strongly criticised the decision? Bit of old school imperialist racism from these elderly Oxbridge judges perhaps?
    How much time have you spent in Rwanda?

  8. #8

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    The judges concluded there was a real risk of harm coming to persons sent back to home countries

    Rwanda is NOT safe enough

    Two out of the three judges sided against the home Secretary

  9. #9

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by caerkid View Post
    The decision that says that the UK shouldn't pay them over £100k a person to receive people ?
    What's their problem?
    Yeah can't think why Rwanda would criticise a decision that stops them making an absolute mint from the UK taxpayer.

    Bizarre policy, predictable outcome (to some of us).

  10. #10

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    Easy to say from Cowbridge eh.

    Interesting that the Rwandan govt have strongly criticised the decision? Bit of old school imperialist racism from these elderly Oxbridge judges perhaps?
    Rwanda https://www.hrw.org/africa/rwanda

    https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/africa/east-africa-the-horn-and-great-lakes/rwanda/report-rwanda/

  11. #11

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    What's where I currently live got to do with my views that this current govt are a bunch of chancers , propped up by the likes of you ?
    What do you suggest we do with them all sludge?

  12. #12

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    What do you suggest we do with them all sludge?
    I hear Rwanda's nice.

  13. #13

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Nigel Farage has tweeted that we should send them back to France. Little does he know that we used to be able to do that when we were a member of a thing called the European Union before some people came along and convinced enough of the population that we'd all be much better off not being a member. Perhaps he could do a bit of research on it if he's got a spare 5 minutes.

  14. #14

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    The military terrorist arm of the corrupt government ?

    Are knocking off government opponents ?

    I heard they were good lads ?

    Mrs Bravermaun sten gen panzer said it was a safe place ?

  15. #15

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    What do you suggest we do with them all sludge?
    I suggest we accept that illegal migration needs a lot more money spent on controlling it and even then it will remain a serious problem

    Doesn't mean we should be happy with it

    However what we shouldn't do is support a policy that sends people to their deaths

    Would you agree ?

  16. #16

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by Undercoverinwurzelland View Post
    Nigel Farage has tweeted that we should send them back to France. Little does he know that we used to be able to do that when we were a member of a thing called the European Union before some people came along and convinced enough of the population that we'd all be much better off not being a member. Perhaps he could do a bit of research on it if he's got a spare 5 minutes.
    I have been watching GB news recently

    Some right nut cases on that

  17. #17

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Cartman View Post
    I hear Rwanda's nice.
    It was

    But now it isn't

    Strange

  18. #18

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    I suggest we accept that illegal migration needs a lot more money spent on controlling it and even then it will remain a serious problem

    Doesn't mean we should be happy with it

    However what we shouldn't do is support a policy that sends people to their deaths

    Would you agree ?
    You could always just answer the question
    What would you - Prime Minister Sludge do with them ?

    That does not mean spending money on stopping it - as they are already here.

    What would you do with the ones already here -
    things like :
    1. Where would you house them ?
    2. Would they have priority over existing people on Council house waiting lists ?
    3. Would you allow them to work ?
    4. Would you allow them to claim benefits ?
    5. Would you offer them safe passage to another country ?

    Stuff like that - away you go - fill ya boots - lets have them policies PM Sludge of Cowbridge Left

  19. #19

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    You could always just answer the question
    What would you - Prime Minister Sludge do with them ?

    That does not mean spending money on stopping it - as they are already here.

    What would you do with the ones already here -
    things like :
    1. Where would you house them ?
    2. Would they have priority over existing people on Council house waiting lists ?
    3. Would you allow them to work ?
    4. Would you allow them to claim benefits ?
    5. Would you offer them safe passage to another country ?

    Stuff like that - away you go - fill ya boots - lets have them policies PM Sludge of Cowbridge Left
    Spending more money .........which was my answer to the question is already on the table

    That will reduce but not deal completely with the problem

    And those questions above you have asked are all a YES from me and even then it's an ongoing issue

    All these control our borders , close the ports is complete nonsense and just vote grabbing

    Bauverman Gestapo is saying the British people want the boats stopped and that's what we are doing !

    The government are hopeless and most people of reasonable mind want an all round approach to migration

    With this lot you just get impossible targets to bribe people into voting for them

    Maybe that's what you want ?

  20. #20

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    I've spent a lot of time in Rwanda and the organisation I work for has an office there.

    It's a beautiful country with lovely people.

    While the government takes two steps forwards with regards to infrastructure (social and transport etc), they take a giant leap backwards with regards to human rights, freedoms , democracy etc. its a very controlling and toxic environment.

    I know people who have been taken by the Rwandan authorities and treated appallingly. I can't elaborate here.

    The last time Rwanda accepted asylum seekers from other countries it was a disaster with many of the asylum seekers being mistreated. When they escaped, they were killed.

    It is not an African utopia.


    As for pipsters questions:

    What would you do with the ones already here -
    things like :

    1. Where would you house them ? - firstly we need to process them quickly to make sure they are not staying in poor conditions paid for (over paid for) by the the public purse. Get them into work and filling the huge shortages we have. They can then pay rent and contribute in taxes. (some people wait 4 (FOUR) years before their claim is accepted or rejected). In terms of housing - this is a bigger issue and i am so disappointed with both main political parties for under investing in homes and also allowing landlords and corporations (many foreign) to buy up properties which could be available. Londongrad explains how so many properties in London are bought by foreign companies or oligarchs and remain empty. With the money allocated to sending people to Rwanda, that could easily be used to make 10000's of empty properties available and fix up the so many dilapidated properties in our cities.

    2. Would they have priority over existing people on Council house waiting lists ?

    See above - no they wouldn't and nor should they... get them into work and let them rent or buy like most others - with the caveat that local authorities get funding from central government to renovate available houses and make them available to everyone.

    3. Would you allow them to work ?

    Yes - why on earth would anyone NOT want them to work? That is mental. Work, pay tax, pay NI, fill the workforce shortages and save us a ton of money to house them for years while we process their claims... a no brainer.

    4. Would you allow them to claim benefits ?

    Allow them to work and let them be a full part of the system - paying TAX and NI and if they do fall out of work, then yes they should be able to claim benefits if they are legally allowed to work and live here.

    5. Would you offer them safe passage to another country ?

    If they wanted it and if they had links to another country... yes. Perhaps we could join some kind of union with our neighbours and negotiate a deal where we share the refugee /asylum population

  21. #21

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by AfricanBluebird View Post
    I've spent a lot of time in Rwanda and the organisation I work for has an office there.

    It's a beautiful country with lovely people.

    While the government takes two steps forwards with regards to infrastructure (social and transport etc), they take a giant leap backwards with regards to human rights, freedoms , democracy etc. its a very controlling and toxic environment.

    I know people who have been taken by the Rwandan authorities and treated appallingly. I can't elaborate here.

    The last time Rwanda accepted asylum seekers from other countries it was a disaster with many of the asylum seekers being mistreated. When they escaped, they were killed.

    It is not an African utopia.


    As for pipsters questions:

    What would you do with the ones already here -
    things like :

    1. Where would you house them ? - firstly we need to process them quickly to make sure they are not staying in poor conditions paid for (over paid for) by the the public purse. Get them into work and filling the huge shortages we have. They can then pay rent and contribute in taxes. (some people wait 4 (FOUR) years before their claim is accepted or rejected). In terms of housing - this is a bigger issue and i am so disappointed with both main political parties for under investing in homes and also allowing landlords and corporations (many foreign) to buy up properties which could be available. Londongrad explains how so many properties in London are bought by foreign companies or oligarchs and remain empty. With the money allocated to sending people to Rwanda, that could easily be used to make 10000's of empty properties available and fix up the so many dilapidated properties in our cities.

    2. Would they have priority over existing people on Council house waiting lists ?

    See above - no they wouldn't and nor should they... get them into work and let them rent or buy like most others - with the caveat that local authorities get funding from central government to renovate available houses and make them available to everyone.

    3. Would you allow them to work ?

    Yes - why on earth would anyone NOT want them to work? That is mental. Work, pay tax, pay NI, fill the workforce shortages and save us a ton of money to house them for years while we process their claims... a no brainer.

    4. Would you allow them to claim benefits ?

    Allow them to work and let them be a full part of the system - paying TAX and NI and if they do fall out of work, then yes they should be able to claim benefits if they are legally allowed to work and live here.

    5. Would you offer them safe passage to another country ?

    If they wanted it and if they had links to another country... yes. Perhaps we could join some kind of union with our neighbours and negotiate a deal where we share the refugee /asylum population
    Join a union where we join our neighbours with a strategic approach to migration ?

    Like the er .....EU ?

    I think 🤔 maybe stay as we are ?

    Tough on the borders , tough on the causes of the borders !

  22. #22

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    What do you suggest we do with them all sludge?
    register them in the system. Give them NI numbers, get them working paying taxes and contributing.

    if there are no illegals then cash in hand jobs disappear. This in turn means wages rise for those who prepared to work in jobs where the employer operates PAYE.

    its full of win.

  23. #23
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    16,092

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by AfricanBluebird View Post
    I've spent a lot of time in Rwanda and the organisation I work for has an office there.

    It's a beautiful country with lovely people.

    While the government takes two steps forwards with regards to infrastructure (social and transport etc), they take a giant leap backwards with regards to human rights, freedoms , democracy etc. its a very controlling and toxic environment.

    I know people who have been taken by the Rwandan authorities and treated appallingly. I can't elaborate here.

    The last time Rwanda accepted asylum seekers from other countries it was a disaster with many of the asylum seekers being mistreated. When they escaped, they were killed.

    It is not an African utopia.


    As for pipsters questions:

    What would you do with the ones already here -
    things like :

    1. Where would you house them ? - firstly we need to process them quickly to make sure they are not staying in poor conditions paid for (over paid for) by the the public purse. Get them into work and filling the huge shortages we have. They can then pay rent and contribute in taxes. (some people wait 4 (FOUR) years before their claim is accepted or rejected). In terms of housing - this is a bigger issue and i am so disappointed with both main political parties for under investing in homes and also allowing landlords and corporations (many foreign) to buy up properties which could be available. Londongrad explains how so many properties in London are bought by foreign companies or oligarchs and remain empty. With the money allocated to sending people to Rwanda, that could easily be used to make 10000's of empty properties available and fix up the so many dilapidated properties in our cities.

    2. Would they have priority over existing people on Council house waiting lists ?

    See above - no they wouldn't and nor should they... get them into work and let them rent or buy like most others - with the caveat that local authorities get funding from central government to renovate available houses and make them available to everyone.

    3. Would you allow them to work ?

    Yes - why on earth would anyone NOT want them to work? That is mental. Work, pay tax, pay NI, fill the workforce shortages and save us a ton of money to house them for years while we process their claims... a no brainer.

    4. Would you allow them to claim benefits ?

    Allow them to work and let them be a full part of the system - paying TAX and NI and if they do fall out of work, then yes they should be able to claim benefits if they are legally allowed to work and live here.

    5. Would you offer them safe passage to another country ?

    If they wanted it and if they had links to another country... yes. Perhaps we could join some kind of union with our neighbours and negotiate a deal where we share the refugee /asylum population
    Very interesting post - especially about the situation in Rwanda.

    Your responses to the pipster questions are also spot on. No one claims the solutions are easy or cheap - but they are right, and much less expensive (or wasteful) than the alternatives that the current government is promoting as a sop to their base.

  24. #24

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by AfricanBluebird View Post
    I've spent a lot of time in Rwanda and the organisation I work for has an office there.

    It's a beautiful country with lovely people.

    While the government takes two steps forwards with regards to infrastructure (social and transport etc), they take a giant leap backwards with regards to human rights, freedoms , democracy etc. its a very controlling and toxic environment.

    I know people who have been taken by the Rwandan authorities and treated appallingly. I can't elaborate here.

    The last time Rwanda accepted asylum seekers from other countries it was a disaster with many of the asylum seekers being mistreated. When they escaped, they were killed.

    It is not an African utopia.


    As for pipsters questions:

    What would you do with the ones already here -
    things like :

    1. Where would you house them ? - firstly we need to process them quickly to make sure they are not staying in poor conditions paid for (over paid for) by the the public purse. Get them into work and filling the huge shortages we have. They can then pay rent and contribute in taxes. (some people wait 4 (FOUR) years before their claim is accepted or rejected). In terms of housing - this is a bigger issue and i am so disappointed with both main political parties for under investing in homes and also allowing landlords and corporations (many foreign) to buy up properties which could be available. Londongrad explains how so many properties in London are bought by foreign companies or oligarchs and remain empty. With the money allocated to sending people to Rwanda, that could easily be used to make 10000's of empty properties available and fix up the so many dilapidated properties in our cities.

    2. Would they have priority over existing people on Council house waiting lists ?

    See above - no they wouldn't and nor should they... get them into work and let them rent or buy like most others - with the caveat that local authorities get funding from central government to renovate available houses and make them available to everyone.

    3. Would you allow them to work ?

    Yes - why on earth would anyone NOT want them to work? That is mental. Work, pay tax, pay NI, fill the workforce shortages and save us a ton of money to house them for years while we process their claims... a no brainer.

    4. Would you allow them to claim benefits ?

    Allow them to work and let them be a full part of the system - paying TAX and NI and if they do fall out of work, then yes they should be able to claim benefits if they are legally allowed to work and live here.

    5. Would you offer them safe passage to another country ?

    If they wanted it and if they had links to another country... yes. Perhaps we could join some kind of union with our neighbours and negotiate a deal where we share the refugee /asylum population
    Well said sir, African Bluebird for PM.

  25. #25

    Re: Rwanda Policy Defeated By UK Court , Braverman spitting teeth

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    Very interesting post - especially about the situation in Rwanda.

    Your responses to the pipster questions are also spot on. No one claims the solutions are easy or cheap - but they are right, and much less expensive (or wasteful) than the alternatives that the current government is promoting as a sop to their base.
    Of course it's a sop

    They are desperate for votes and a pull on the right wing flog em , send em back puppet strings is always worth a try

    That Brauverman is a shocking neo con

    Who votes for a nut case like her ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •