Reply With QuoteOh no, not another one! How many more are there???
I wouldn't expect many replies, as a lot of people were pushing this stuff.
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
https://trusttheevidence.substack.co...ion-riddle-7a8
Interestingly another Conspiracy that’s true
So, yet again, we’re left with authoritarian advice that isn’t backed up by the evidence. It is not the first time we have come across the problem of evidence-free assertions. In 2020, we did not realise that “cases” were defined as PCR positivity alone (or other tests) in symptomatic people without any reference to viral load or the properties of the tests.
Therefore, we asked those responsible for pandemic management in Lombardy to test for the presence of other agents, which could partly explain the spread and seeming lethality of SARS-CoV-2. Unfortunately, because of political interference, our requests fell on deaf ears; we will probably never know what else was circulating at the time.
By the end of 2022, over 6.5 billion SARs-CoV-2 tests were done worldwide, pretty close to a test for everyone on the planet if you count all discarded. The US had done over a billion, the highest of any country; the UK, half a billion. Such use, on an industrial scale, is unprecedented and has helped distort perceptions, as we shall discuss in subsequent posts.
Oh no, not another one! How many more are there???
I wouldn't expect many replies, as a lot of people were pushing this stuff.
Interesting edit from 'nonsense' to 'stuff', why did you think that was necessary?Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Oh no, not another one! How many more are there???
I wouldn't expect many replies, as a lot of people were pushing this stuff.
What nonsense/stuff are you referring to specifically?
I was trying to be thoughtful with my words, so I self-corrected, but I knew it wouldn't be too long before somebody came along and tried to derail the thread with their "don't look here, look over there" tactics. Well done, you didn't disappoint
Furthermore the OP is self-explanatory, so maybe you should be focussing your attention on responding to the points raised there, instead of creating another strawman argument.
That's a very defensive reaction. Far from trying to derail the thread I'm trying to find out what you think the article validates.I was trying to be thoughtful with my words, so I self-corrected, but I knew it wouldn't be too long before somebody came along and tried to derail the thread with their "don't look here, look over there" tactics. Well done, you didn't disappoint
Furthermore the OP is self-explanatory, so maybe you should be focussing your attention on responding to the points raised there, instead of creating another strawman argument.
Posting Permissions
