"During a break in one of those long days of evidence, I happened to encounter Dario in a corridor. There was no conversation as such. He seemed to speak no English. There were lawyers around. It was to fill a momentary silence, more than anything, that I asked if he felt the inquest might be the end of it, the end of the headlines, the end of the line. The look on his face seemed to say ‘yes’.Little did he know. Five years on and still the cheap haggling for cash goes on."

This sums up how biased this article is. He openly states he can't speak English but then somehow he has understood a complex question and was able to answer it.

Also the fact he says he asked this question to fill a silence is also nonsense. He has clearly asked this from a journalistic viewpoint. If it was even asked at all.