Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
Correct, it passed over Turkey on 11th August, then less than 1 week later this happened:-

17th Auhust 1999
A 7.4-magnitude 1999 İzmit earthquake named earthquake strikes İzmit, Turkey, killing more than 17,000 and injuring 44,000.
So first it’s not comparable to a coast to coast event but now it is because a week later an earthquake killed 17,000 people?

What about other notable earthquakes? The 2004 Boxing Day earthquake that killed over 200,000 people was 5 weeks after a total solar eclipse in Antarctica.

The 2010 Haiti earthquake that killed 160,000 people happened 4 days before a solar eclipse in Africa. The most recent before that was 6 months before. Was this a very delayed reaction or a preemptive attack by the moon?

The 2008 Sichaun earthquake, with 90,000 deaths, was more than 3 months after a partial eclipse.

The earthquake in Turkey last year with 60,000 deaths was over 4 months after a partial eclipse in north Europe and Asia.

The 2005 Pakistan earthquake, with 90,000 deaths, was 5 days after a partial eclipse in Pakistan itself.

If the last one was caused in part by a partial eclipse, why don’t total eclipses cause death tolls that (excuse the pun) eclipse any of the others?

What’s the correlation between solar eclipses and Cardiff City wins? Or Cardiff City wins and subsequent earthquakes? Food for thought.