Forest's arguments:
1) That they could have sold Brennan Johnson for £30m before the PSR deadline but held out for £47.5m after it, making their business more, not less, sustainable as a result;
2) It's unfair that they can only make a £61m loss over 3 years as they spent 2 of them in the championship but most of the teams they're competing against can make a £105m loss.

Can see the logic to both of those. The rules favouring the big boys again?