+ Book a Young Driver Training Course at Cardiff City Stadium now!

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #7251

    Re: GLAMMY

    Nice start for mason crane.

  2. #7252

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Worcester View Post
    Nice start for mason crane.
    5/55. Excellent figures. A very useful lead of 76. We need to bat until midway through tomorrow's morning session and set them 300 plus.

  3. #7253

    Re: GLAMMY

    Crane spinning the ball a lot and all three of Hadley’s wickets had the batsman getting into weird positions as he got surprising bounce out of a pretty lifeless pitch.

  4. #7254

    Re: GLAMMY

    I popped down for a couple of sessions yesterday, and didn’t expect Glamorgan to bowl out Yorkshire quite so easy today. The pitch was so slow and lifeless yesterday. Every shot sounded as if it came off the bottom of the bat. But I suppose I did think that if Dom Bess could bowl so economical, then Crane and Kellaway could enjoy themselves. It is ridiculously early to start the county season though. The outfield unsurprisingly was so slow. A couple of dry weeks and a bit of sun and it will feel much more like the cricket season.

  5. #7255

    Re: GLAMMY

    111-3 at the close. Glamorgan going along at around two and a half runs an over again,. It’s going to be a tricky declaration tomorrow for Carlson - in a way it might be best to score about a hundred and get bowled out because that would mean the wicket was probably doing a bit.

  6. #7256

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    111-3 at the close. Glamorgan going along at around two and a half runs an over again,. ItÂ’s going to be a tricky declaration tomorrow for Carlson - in a way it might be best to score about a hundred and get bowled out because that would mean the wicket was probably doing a bit.
    Think he will now look to bat through the entire first session and hopefully set 300. They do need to show a bit more intent tomorrow.

  7. #7257

    Re: GLAMMY

    That's a brave declaration.. Can't understand why Glammy didn't back for the extra couple of overs until lunch to get over 300 ahead. A bit surprising. Yorkshire need 295 to win off 68 overs.

  8. #7258

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    That's a brave declaration.. Can't understand why Glammy didn't back for the extra couple of overs until lunch to get over 300 ahead. A bit surprising. Yorkshire need 295 to win off 68 overs.
    it is early nice to see though

  9. #7259

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    That's a brave declaration.. Can't understand why Glammy didn't back for the extra couple of overs until lunch to get over 300 ahead. A bit surprising. Yorkshire need 295 to win off 68 overs.
    Not sure I would call it brave. Getting 300 in 2 sessions on the last day would he some feat and we need to get wins when we have the opportunity.

  10. #7260

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Blue View Post
    Not sure I would call it brave. Getting 300 in 2 sessions on the last day would he some feat and we need to get wins when we have the opportunity.
    It's 8 point for a draw these days. The pitch is placid. Yorkshire only need to go at just over 4 an over. Its a generous declaration alright.

  11. #7261

    Re: GLAMMY

    A very encouraging first game all things considered- think it’s reasonable to think we would have won without the delays on the first day.

  12. #7262

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    A very encouraging first game all things considered- think it’s reasonable to think we would have won without the delays on the first day.
    Very encouraging and gave it a right go with a generous declaration. Taking 17 wickets after losing a day is positive.

  13. #7263

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    A very encouraging first game all things considered- think it’s reasonable to think we would have won without the delays on the first day.
    Very encouraging. We definitely had the better of the game.

  14. #7264

    Re: GLAMMY

    The pessimist in me wonders if that could be a missed opportunity come the end of the season, but in fairness I don't think Carlson could have been any more positive with the declaration. If we'd scored quicker Sun evening/Mon morning, we could have arguably given ourselves 10 more overs to try and bowl them out, but it's hard to be negative.

    Thought Hadley had a good debut after a wobbly start; jury's still out on Dickson as a red ball batsman (I see Northeast scored 94 for Kent, incidentally).

    Despite taking 17 wickets in 130 odd overs, we're still clearly a pace bowler short, too. Interesting that Nick Webb said Harris took a job offer that came out of the blue, which suggests he left Glammy in the lurch a little bit. Maybe Surrey or one of the other "big" counties have a talented young seamer we can borrow for a bit.

  15. #7265

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by FormerlyJohnnyBreadhead View Post
    The pessimist in me wonders if that could be a missed opportunity come the end of the season, but in fairness I don't think Carlson could have been any more positive with the declaration. If we'd scored quicker Sun evening/Mon morning, we could have arguably given ourselves 10 more overs to try and bowl them out, but it's hard to be negative.

    Thought Hadley had a good debut after a wobbly start; jury's still out on Dickson as a red ball batsman (I see Northeast scored 94 for Kent, incidentally).

    Despite taking 17 wickets in 130 odd overs, we're still clearly a pace bowler short, too. Interesting that Nick Webb said Harris took a job offer that came out of the blue, which suggests he left Glammy in the lurch a little bit. Maybe Surrey or one of the other "big" counties have a talented young seamer we can borrow for a bit.
    I was quite surprised Leonard didn’t play.

  16. #7266

    Re: GLAMMY

    you cant ask for a better start, leg stump out the ground first ball notts 0-1

  17. #7267

    Re: GLAMMY

    Notts 101-5 at lunch - three wickets for Van Der Gugten.

    Doesn’t look good dropping your new batsman after just one game mind.

    I mentioned Leonard in a previous message, but he won’t be playing until the end of May due to injury and he’s missing all of this first group of four day fixtures.

  18. #7268

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Notts 101-5 at lunch - three wickets for Van Der Gugten.

    Doesn’t look good dropping your new batsman after just one game mind.

    I mentioned Leonard in a previous message, but he won’t be playing until the end of May due to injury and he’s missing all of this first group of four day fixtures.
    I wonder if they have made an early call on Dickson being a white ball cricketer only. Friendly with die hard Somerset fan who was not at all surprised we signed him, but very surprised we selected him for our opening 4 day game back in div 1.

  19. #7269

    Re: GLAMMY

    Notts 279 all out, four wickets each for Hadley and Van Der Gugten, but Glamorgan struggling at 20-2 in reply.

    Kellaway is injured and has been substituted by Dickson.

  20. #7270

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Notts 279 all out, four wickets each for Hadley and Van Der Gugten, but Glamorgan struggling at 20-2 in reply.

    Kellaway is injured and has been substituted by Dickson.
    That's a blow. Will do well to get anything out of this. Hopefully the weather will help.

  21. #7271

    Re: GLAMMY

    Ouch. Losing Carlson at the end of the day means advantage Notts. At 79/4 a lot resting on Ingram.

  22. #7272

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    Ouch. Losing Carlson at the end of the day means advantage Notts. At 79/4 a lot resting on Ingram.
    Excellent article by Atherton in yesterday's Times - Mason Crane played one Ashes Test match, and had 1 - 190 something, though he "didn't bowl that badly."
    Atherton hoping leg-spin is coming back.
    So do I!

    Glammy 80-4 at the close.

  23. #7273

    Re: GLAMMY

    its all going wrong this morning 87-6

  24. #7274

    Re: GLAMMY

    92/8 which i guess is effectively 92/9 with Ben Kellaway not being involved

  25. #7275

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bloop View Post
    92/8 which i guess is effectively 92/9 with Ben Kellaway not being involved
    dickson replaced him as a substitute

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •