Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
You're making a few assumptions about what I'm saying there which aren't true. Of course something like this should be followed up, as opposed to forgotten about on the assumption that they were part of a huge sample. All I'm saying is that the overall number that ninety one comes from is of huge significance as to how big a problem this could be given that there always seems to be a small minority that test positive twice in any pandemic. As for those results from China, they've been knocking around for a little time now and I would have thought there would have been more figures to back it up by now from that Connery if they existed - I would qualify that by saying I would be more confident in that view if it involved a country other than China.
We really need more data from more countries.