The whole thing sets a precedent for “self defence” where you carry a gun get into an argument and shoot someone citing self defence.

Absolute madness you can just carry a gun to “defend a town” against protesters and shoulder no blame at all for killing someone whatever the circumstances.

The biggest argument against allowing gun ownership is how a situation like this can escalate so quickly just because of the gun.

And the fact he’s become a political figure with certain politicians using him to gain popularity shows the state politics in that country is in.