Climate fanatics - where are you

[Doucas]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

Ah come on now. You’re not allowed to hold people accountable for their actions. As long as they say “the right thing” that’s enough for the baboons in society. But just look at the patterns of play from those who squawk the loudest….

- Al Gore: Makes a film and gets a load of actors to make a noise for him, then makes billions off carbon trading exchange investment. Ker-Ching!!!

- Bill Clinton: Was almost broke at end of his presidency. Bangs on about global poverty with his wife, creates a load of charities to promote helping poverty then they pocket a fortune in annual salaries from their “charities”, ans divert US taxpayers money to Africa. Meanwhile people in Alabama cannot get clean water. Never mind, Ker-Ching!!!!

- Nancy Pelosi brings a load of anti trust lawsuits, pretending to fight against corruption. Meanwhile she makes a fortune as a huge options trader off corruption lawsuits and insider information. Ker-Ching!!!!

- Bono of U2 singing about poverty and pestering low and middle income to part with their money “until it hurts” to help famine in Africa, only to be squirrelling away his millions in Switzerland and minimizing his taxes. Ker-Ching!!

Greta “The Fretter” Thunberg. Too “young, dumb and full of cum” (as Eminem sang) to figure out how to make money from her antics just yet but give her time. She is building her public profile nicely. Someone will show her how to grift some money out of it soon. But for the moment it is “protest about the environment” whilst joyfully playing her part in soaking the clouds in jet fuel.

All of the above behaviour is like a male campaigning on behalf of the Me Too movement, only to find out that behind closed doors they are behaving like Josef Fritzl. I have maximum cynicism for people who try to play Mother Theresa. Often, my antenna starts twitching and soon enough you find double standards.

Practice what you preach, c*nts, then we’ll have an adult conversation. Until then, get your own sh1t together instead of preaching to us all like a dirty priest.

For the 50th time on this forum...

What is the physical process scientists say is causing man made climate change, what about that process do you disagree with?

Bet you can't answer.

It's getting hotter and hotter every year, the increase is accelerating also, we've gone past 1.5 degrees quicker than we thought. We are utterly screwed and we have mostly older people just sticking their fingers in their ears 'lalala not listening'.

[TWGL1]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

[QUOTE=Doucas;5510283]For the 50th time on this forum...

What is the physical process scientists say is causing man made climate change, what about that process do you disagree with?

Bet you can't answer.

It's getting hotter and hotter every year, the increase is accelerating also, we've gone past 1.5 degrees quicker than we thought. We are utterly screwed and we have mostly older people just sticking their fingers in their ears 'lalala not listening'.[/QUOTE

[Keyser Soze]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

For the 50th time on this forum...

What is the physical process scientists say is causing man made climate change, what about that process do you disagree with?

Bet you can't answer.

It's getting hotter and hotter every year, the increase is accelerating also, we've gone past 1.5 degrees quicker than we thought. We are utterly screwed and we have mostly older people just sticking their fingers in their ears 'lalala not listening'.

More people on the planet. Global GDP went up. Suntan is better last year than year before. Feeling great 😎

Do one, dirty preacher

[Doucas]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

More people on the planet. Global GDP went up. Suntan is better last year than year before. Feeling great 😎

Do one, dirty preacher

As predicted you can't answer.

None of you science deniers can.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

As predicted you can't answer.

None of you science deniers can.

Although I consider many of your post unneccesarily aggresive and counter-productive, your approach to such things is very interesting indeed. You are asking for someone to understand the theories and scientific papers regarding certain subject matter and then to critique them and express why they may disagree with them. Unfortunately, the ignorant have a different approach......

[Doucas]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

Although I consider many of your post unneccesarily aggresive and counter-productive, your approach to such things is very interesting indeed. You are asking for someone to understand the theories and scientific papers regarding certain subject matter and then to critique them and express why they may disagree with them. Unfortunately, the ignorant have a different approach......

I disagree, I don't think you need to read scientific papers for this. The process that's causing it is well known. The second part of the question is impossible to answer because there isn't an answer. They know this which is why they deflect, insult and ramble about Greta or triple glazing windows, one even threaten to fight me instead.

If you can deny something so doggedly surely you can answer the absolute basics around it but I don't think they've actually ever thought about it without being influenced by their oil funded propaganda. They're more like animals reacting to stimuli e.g. caring for environment bad, Greta bad, renewable energy bad etc.

[TWGL1]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

I disagree, I don't think you need to read scientific papers for this. The process that's causing it is well known. The second part of the question is impossible to answer because there isn't an answer. They know this which is why they deflect, insult and ramble about Greta or triple glazing windows, one even threaten to fight me instead.

If you can deny something so doggedly surely you can answer the absolute basics around it but I don't think they've actually ever thought about it without being influenced by their oil funded propaganda. They're more like animals reacting to stimuli e.g. caring for environment bad, Greta bad, renewable energy bad etc.

There are also plenty of eminent scientists who think the opposite to you , as long as you understand that then there is nothing more to say really is there ?

You’re trying to be clever that’s all. Your persistence is quite simply staggering when all you have done is google your question. Big deal.

it appears to me know as much on the subject as everyone else. The rich don’t seem to care about it either what with their private jets, super yacht’s etc etc, so why should we ?

Electric cars are a point in question, their carbon footprint is higher than a normal combustion vehicle.
Give it a rest bra.

[Doucas]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

There are also plenty of eminent scientists who think the opposite to you , as long as you understand that then there is nothing more to say really is there ?

You’re trying to be clever that’s all. Your persistence is quite simply staggering when all you have done is google your question. Big deal.

it appears to me know as much on the subject as everyone else. The rich don’t seem to care about it either what with their private jets, super yacht’s etc etc, so why should we?

Electric cars are a point in question, their carbon footprint is higher than a normal combustion vehicle.
Give it a rest bra.

Ok if there are scientists that think the opposite of me, quote them on what exactly about the physical process that scientists say causes climate change that they disagree with.

Literally none of you can answer it or even attempt to answer it despite asking 50+ times.

You know you can't answer, I know you can't and the whole of this forum knows it.

[TWGL1]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

Ok if there are scientists that think the opposite of me, quote them on what exactly about the physical process that scientists say causes climate change that they disagree with.

Literally none of you can answer it or even attempt to answer it despite asking 50+ times.

You know you can't answer, I know you can't and the whole of this forum knows it.

I can answer it the same way as you found the question , when are you going to see the correlation?

Anyone who refuses to have kids on the basis of a current narrative cannot be taken seriously. It’s hilarious that you’re so brainwashed.

[Doucas]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

I can answer it the same way as you found the question , when are you going to see the correlation?

Anyone who refuses to have kids on the basis of a current narrative cannot be taken seriously. It’s hilarious that you’re so brainwashed.

But you can't answer it though, because on 50+ times I've asked you still haven't even attempted.

I came up with that question by myself but even if I googled it who cares? It's still a good question because ignorant people like you just can't answer it.

I won't bother with you now, no amount of evidence will change your mind, the only thing left to do is sit and wait for your lot to die off and get out the way, I don't think it'll be too long.

[A Quiet Monkfish]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

But you can't answer it though, because on 50+ times I've asked you still haven't even attempted.

I came up with that question by myself but even if I googled it who cares? It's still a good question because ignorant people like you just can't answer it.

I won't bother with you now, no amount of evidence will change your mind, the only thing left to do is sit and wait for your lot to die off and get out the way, I don't think it'll be too long.

Yeah, but at least we'll have our kids to carry on the baton, so-to-speak..

[Wash DC Blue]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

For the 50th time on this forum...

What is the physical process scientists say is causing man made climate change, what about that process do you disagree with?

Bet you can't answer.

Human-driven causes of climate change

Scientists agree that human activity is the primary driver of what we’re seeing now worldwide. (This type of climate change is sometimes referred to as anthropogenic, which is just a way of saying “caused by human beings.”) The unchecked burning of fossil fuels over the past 150 years has drastically increased the presence of atmospheric greenhouse gases, most notably carbon dioxide. At the same time, logging and development have led to the widespread destruction of forests, wetlands, and other carbon sinks—natural resources that store carbon dioxide and prevent it from being released into the atmosphere.

Right now, atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide are the highest they’ve been in the last 800,000 years. Some greenhouse gases, like hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HFCs), do not even exist in nature. By continuously pumping these gases into the air, we helped raise the earth’s average temperature by about 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit during the 20th century—which has brought us to our current era of deadly, and increasingly routine, weather extremes. And it’s important to note that while climate change affects everyone in some way, it doesn’t do so equally: All over the world, people of color and those living in economically disadvantaged or politically marginalized communities bear a much larger burden, despite the fact that these communities play a much smaller role in warming the planet.

Our ways of generating power for electricity, heat, and transportation, our built environment and industries, our ways of interacting with the land, and our consumption habits together serve as the primary drivers of climate change. While the percentages of greenhouse gases stemming from each source may fluctuate, the sources themselves remain relatively consistent.


As to if whether I agree with that or not…
I do, but the best way to tackle things is really the crux of the matter.
Geopolitics and economics matter just as much to civilization as the climate.

It doesn’t help that we are apparently reaching critical mass during a time that where narratives on any single topic seem to be polarizing.

Some people seem so hell bent on the deconstruction of Western Civilization that it’s understandable people being skeptical regarding proposed sweeping changes.

Then there is the debate, particularly in the UK regarding the percentage of emissions created compared to BRICS/USA etc.

[Doucas]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

Yeah, but at least we'll have our kids to carry on the baton, so-to-speak..

Yeah but they'll also think you're stupid for denying basic science, being anti vaxxers, thinking the Earth is flat etc.

[TWGL1]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

Yeah but they'll also think you're stupid for denying basic science, being anti vaxxers, thinking the Earth is flat etc.

Oh not the old anti-vaxxer abuse. You’re so out of date on this. Do you do any research

Are you a government bot ?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Climate fanatics - where are you

Human-driven causes of climate change

Scientists agree that human activity is the primary driver of what we’re seeing now worldwide. (This type of climate change is sometimes referred to as anthropogenic, which is just a way of saying “caused by human beings.”) The unchecked burning of fossil fuels over the past 150 years has drastically increased the presence of atmospheric greenhouse gases, most notably carbon dioxide. At the same time, logging and development have led to the widespread destruction of forests, wetlands, and other carbon sinks—natural resources that store carbon dioxide and prevent it from being released into the atmosphere.

Do they? Every single one? Or are these ones from the Safe&Effective™ school of science?