| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Originally Posted by Croesy Blue
Aah yes, that was it. So following Sidney's logic, no one from a western country should be allowed to enter Australia. Because you just don't know that those white immigrants will do the same again.
It isn't ironic, you ****ing dil. I KNOW what aggressive, invasive cultures did to the Australians, the south americans, the caribbeans, etc, etc. They all but wiped them out. yes ? do you agree ? An aggressive, invasive culture is NOT good for the indigenous population. Do you agree ? Well, do you? So, do you think the Western world will fare better or worse with a massive influx of un-educated* muslims ? *NB I am all in favour of accepting educated, civilised muslim families, as they are most likely to integrate and live "normal" lives. I do have an issue with an influx of random "fighting age" males. Seriously, don'yt you ? Do you have daughters ?
I fit in with the culture here. I don't want to blow people up. Please elaborate on your attempted sarcastic hypothesis, bell-end.
Fighting age males
I thought the war in the Middle East was the product of zionists, surely that means the Muslims are just innocent pawns in all this?
Ha-Ha.
"I wouldn't waste my time" means "I can't" tool.
I know you won't because it's just a standard libtard put-down, but please explain "Sidney's logic", as I don't think you have.
Nice soundbite, though.
Okay... my opinions
RIP to those who died in all attacks, may Allah grant them a place in Jannah
And these morons who did the attacks, **** them, they do not rep us
Also why should countries ban all Muslims? Why should I be punished for their actions? Other groups have done more attacks than Muslims in the Western World.
:heheFighting age males
I thought the war in the Middle East was the product of zionists, surely that means the Muslims are just innocent pawns in all this?
I've discussed it plenty in this thread. There's no hope for you, you've shown how ignorant you are and unwilling to listen to others views without resorting to insults.
Also anyone who uses phrases like "libitard" I tend to find has read so much American internet nonsense they are beyond reproach. You'd do yourself much less disservice if you tried discussing a topic properly rather than using these childish and stupid phrases.
Quite.
"That don't kill me can only make me stronger" Like Aids.
Not only does this little quip you've copied from reddit or 4chan not work here you've also butchered it with terrible grammar.
Also adz I don't think mentions of allah or any other religious stuff is sensible in a thread like this.
You said you wanted to ban all Muslims (or all people from Muslim countries, it got a bit confused) from entering the west because of the appalling deeds of some, so why wouldn't you want to ban all westerners from Australia for what was done to the Aboriginals?
It seems odd that you're so against outside cultures potentially eradicating native ones when you're now living in a country that has suffered greatly and you are of that offending culture yourself. I suspect that behind the insults, you might realise you're not in the strongest position to argue the point. Unless you think it's all ok now because the West 'won'.
You know, that is an intelligent and reasoned reply from you.
I apologise for gratuitously using offensive phrases. It was uncalled-for.
So, back to the debate. Could you please elaborate in this statement ? I'm sure it's just me being obtuse, but I'd be grateful if you could help me out here. "I thought the war in the Middle East was the product of zionists, surely that means the Muslims are just innocent pawns in all this?"
If you know me well, you'd know that Im a hip hop fan. These are song lyrics
Why not?
As far as I am aware, "allah" is the arabic word for God.
Will you similarly be chastising Christians who are keeping the victims in their prayers?
Yes I can't stand it when religion is brought into situations like this.
Sorry if your offended, I was just praying that the dead go to paradise. I dont mean to push religion
I DID NOT say I wanted to ban all muslims. I said allow in muslims who are professional famlies, and not immediately let in thousands of fighting-age males.
I am NOT against outside cultures (you know, this is all pointless, as we won't change each other's viewpoints and all we'll do is trade insults). As I've already mentioned, to reinforce my very point, I know what happens when an aggressive, invasive culture overtakes another, more benign, liberal culture. It ain't pretty. The aboriginals were treated as sub-human up until the 1970's - their descendants will pay the price for generations to come. A civilised, democratic, modern country would not allow that to happen. It only happens when people just close their eyes to what is happening. Remember the Nazis and the Neville Chamberlain quote: "Here is the paper that bears his name as well as mine......" Compromise seemed better than conflict.
It's all denial. It's called appeasement.
I DO realise I am not in the strongest position. I know that belittling is the only response from the liberal left (AKA the public - who are fed shit by the zionist media, and believe it).
The West is/was a considerable achievement; a democratic society that allowed women's rights, allowed people to be gay without persecution or hanging or beheading, allowed people to worship whatever their beliefs, all to be treated the same. I fail to see how regular terrorist attacks are in any way better than Western civilisation. I think women should be educated and be allowed to vote and allowed to drive. Do you ?
I am aware of what invasive species can do. Are you ?
I cut and pasted that quote from adz's page. Still critical of it now ? No ? Thought not. Innit.
That's how it works on here, if they can't silence you they will attack you instead.
And its a song lyric, so?
Who's trying to silence anyone? All I said is I don't think religion and prayers have any place in this sort of discussion as it detracts from the actual discussion.
You seem awfully paranoid.
You have your history wrong with regards to Neville Chamberlain.
If Britain had found themselves at war with Germany at that time, we would have been destroyed. And the military advisors knew it. So while the ink was still wet on the piece of paper Chamberlain was waving he was also sanctioning a huge increase in Britain's military capabilities, without which we could not have won the war.
Unfortunately, history has not been kind to Chamberlain, as Churchill made sure he took all of the credit, and chamberlain was portrayed the way he generally is, but the delay in starting the war and subsequent rearmament are arguably more important than anything Churchill did.
Could just make them eat a bacon sandwich and drink an Irish coffee at passport control.
If they eat it they're in.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote