+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Hey Blue In The Face, you must have missed the memo. They're not doing the missile Pentagon thing any more.
Now the Splottatron is going to have to make yet another embarrassing U-turn on this.
Lardy, you know nothing is ruled out or ruled in. The only thing that we know for certain is that the official 9/11 Commission Report cannot be treated seriously.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yzKeM5pVUQ
In the light of fresh, new or compelling irrefutable evidence we all have to look at what it was we thought was likely as a scenario. No one on here has ever stood by the official 9/11 Commission Report. How could they when members of that very Commission now distance themselves from what was in effect their own report.
There are too many angles that have been created Lardy, which is why the controversy rages on some fifteen years later.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-911...ttacks/5303012
I'm not aware of making any such assertion. I've never seen anyone attempt to defend the official report, debate it in detail, or provide any evidence to substantiate its findings. I don't class attempts to discredit any other alternative explanation for 9/11 as an effort to justify or defend the official report. The two are entirely unconnected.
If you're not aware, try reading the posts I quoted.
Now I do agree with you there, Mr Splott. There are too many people on this board who think that posting up a link to a blog is sufficient for debate. Allow me to give you an example:
A few weeks ago, someone was saying that the Russians were banned from the Olympics without anyone from Russia being spoken to. I thought this was odd and, being intellectually curious, I naturally read the article he linked. It turned out, believe it or not, that he was entirely mistaken.
Was this deliberate subterfuge or did he simply misunderstand basic English? Impossible to say, of course.
He often claims others are idiots.
And most of his posts are links to opinions and articles not his own.
I think you will find that essentially the article was correct and specifically it depends on the definition of who or what organisation was not spoken to and whether it was custom and practice to consult with them.
https://www.rt.com/sport/351957-wada...ussia-mclaren/
Yep.
We all think we have our own minds. It is that theory that everything is predetermined isn't it.
Our DNA and upbringing, things we have no control over, they decide who we are what we do. I could decide to stub my toe thinking I decide whether I do it or not. But how I am wired makes the final decision.
He seems to think he some how different. When he is just another mush of atoms rehashing old cynical arguments.
Last edited by LordKenwyne; 01-09-16 at 12:50.