How did the police get involved if she can't remember anything?
Did she actually make a complaint?
Just wondering
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
How did the police get involved if she can't remember anything?
Did she actually make a complaint?
Just wondering
She couldn't remember anything so thought someone had spiked her drink and went to the police. They found no traces of anything in her system like that, but in investigating they found that she'd had sex with the 2 guys(because the guys told the police) as a result the police brought the rape charge, it was never the girl.
Next witness for the defence is a friend if the complainant who cannot be named for legal reasons....
So far it doesn't look like anything has been said at the trial that's likely to change people's opinions - either way.
There is the whole issue with this case. We arent talking about 2 situations, we are talking about a scale along which there seems to be a movable tipping point that isn't backed by science or reason.
For some girls, 2 drinks might be too much for her to be fully aware of what is going on. Some people experience memory loss after drinking but they were completely coherent and their behaviour was completely normal throughout.
This case isnt really about ched anymore.
https://twitter.com/adavies4
Reading this guys reports today it looks like an acquaintance of the woman but also someone who wants to help Ched.
Not sure if this was the new evidence that helped him at appeal, if so its not exactly explosive.
I've said it time and time again... she was a slag who thought she bagged a footballer, then when macdonald ****ed off she thought she had a second shot.
She woke up gutted and used.
Facking slag.
The main characters in this courtroom saga appear to be deeply flawed and highly immoral. Sort of Jeremy Kyle guests in waiting. A young, foul-mouthed drunken strumpet who's also fond of illegal drugs got humped by lying blokes out on the pull for someone equally permissive. It seems like the cops chose to make something out of nothing for reasons which remain unclear.
A verdict by a Court is meant to be beyond reasonable doubt. In this case there is not only doubt about the evidence but about everyone involved including the girl herself. For the sake of justice Evans (scumbag though he is) must be found Not Guilty.
we have all read stories of her being " less than nun like "
but this from the trial today paints her in the delightful picture
"She came up to me and said that if I took her home she would give me a good time," the man said.
But she doesn't remember anything other than the hotel lobby and a pizza so how can she have remembered having consented to sex with McDonald?
Did she consent earlier? So if she is later paralytic McDonalds defence is ' she said yes earlier'?
She seems to remember key issues that suit her story. Curious that.
I havent followed the trial that closely but what I assume is that the court may not have necessarily found Clayton innocent, just that there was reasonable doubt that he wasnt guilty. By going back to the room with him there was a reasonable assumption that she planned to have sex with him. She never went back with Ched. He let himself into the room with a key from reception and had sex...
Many strong views on here about Evans all gathered from media reports I assume as I doubt anyone on here has ever met him.On the basis of those reports he doesn't seem a very nice man.
My thoughts on this are very simplistic-the original verdict has been deemed unsafe and therefore has raised an element of doubt.I found it strange that they ordered a re-trial on that basis but if I were a juror now whilst I would listen to the evidence that thought would be in the back of my mind as the Judges clearly thought there was doubt.
On that basis I think it would be odd if he is now found guilty-if he is surely the first thing he will do is appeal.