Interesting to see physiognomy making a comeback DV... What are your views on phrenology?
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Thank heavens you're here, Organ. I was down to my last few bullets. I don't know what's wrong with some of these posters. When they post on football they seem quite normal but then they come on here and go completely nuts. Everyone is corruptible - present company excepted - and the only thing to work out is what is being used to corrupt them - money or sex.
Interesting to see physiognomy making a comeback DV... What are your views on phrenology?
This kind of highlights the only point I have to make on this. You are sceptical of everything 'our' leaders do but instantly willing to accept that Assad is a lovely guy from an interview or two. You are sceptical of the BBC but instantly willing to accept that a state owned Russian television channel is a non biased source. I can handle someone who doesn't trust people (especially people in power - it makes sense), but you seem to randomly heap trust onto people and they always happen to be people who are currently in some kind of battle with the west. This seems strange to me.
Is it organ vincent or david morgan
All I am saying is that we are being told by our media that he and his wife are evil. Yet when I listen to what he has to say and when I look at how he and his wife present themselves then I find it hard to believe he is an evil person. I think someone is lying. It takes a lot to pull the wool over my eyes and in this case I think someone is trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
We are not talking about phrenology. But we do judge people on their appearance and speech. It is not the last word, of course, but it counts. For example, when I read that some woman had lost a vibrator up her jacksie and had gone to press with her story I knew that she would not look very intelligent. If I had been asked to pick a likely candidate out of lineup then I would have gone for someone gormless looking and in this case I would have been right. You can never be certain but this is the way we think. I have watched a few interviews with Mrs Assad. In my experience women as intelligent, as attractive and as honest looking as Mrs Assad are not monsters. She could be an exception. But I would think it is highly unlikely.
It doesn't mate, you are a prime target because you think you are intelligent but actually pretty thick.
As much as it hurts me to say it at least with Gluey and Organ you know there is some intelligence in there. For example, they'd never dream of starting a thread and saying "this blokes trustworthy because he's nice in an interview".
Isn't Assad our bestie now? We were hoping to try to bomb the crap out of his regime not so long ago. I have no idea how good or bad he is but frankly have no faith in our own leaders or indeed our own media reporting of the Middle East.
A quick update on the build-up to World War III. For the first time since 1941 and Operation Barbarossa, German tanks are trundling towards the Russian border. Meanwhile, most of Russia's navy, including its sole aircraftt carrier, is steaming towards Syria, and the US has suggested that the estimated 10,000 Islamic State terrorists defending Mosul in Iraq could surrender to be given safe passage to Syria (whether Syria wants them or not).
A face to face interview is probably the most effective way of assessing someone. That's why you rarely get a job without one.
You seem to be saying we should just go on the opinion of others who might be biased. If I only based my opinion of you on what other posters on here think of you then that would be unfair. For example, I don't think you are "a complete and utter knob".
I base my opinion of the character of the Assads on what I can see and hear myself. I don't want some religious nutter or some corrupt politician telling me what to think about them. As far as I can see they do not look or sound like crazed blood thirsty tyrants.
German tanks on the move towards Russia, Operation Anaconda - http://www.internationalman.com/arti...lready-started
Russian fleets on way to Syria - http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/ru...-a3374586.html
ISIS in Mosul free passage to Syria - https://www.rt.com/news/362559-syria-iraq-mosul-isis/
It's indisputable that ISIS was created by Saudi Arabia and continues to be funded by it. Our corporate media and government lovers hereabouts pretend not to know that 'cos then they would have to reconcile why the US/UK, etc, remains big chums with them. Saudi Arabia, US, UK, etc, etc, are the same team of mobsters.
Other than some vague references to operation anaconda the article uses many words to say nothing.
Second source is old news
Third uses an unnamed source to peddle anti west pro russian propoganda and you've managed to increase the number of isis terrorists by at least 2,000.
Hate to break this to you Dai, but you watched a You Tube video, not have a "face to face interview"
I'm not telling you anything of the sort other than to never judge a book by it's cover. History is littered with charismatic psychopaths. You seem to think you can tell someone by a few interviews designed to make them look good. Personally I think there is a bot more too it than that.