That's it for me, then.

[the other bob wilson]

Is 90 your IQ?

I'm not renewing because I am skint. I am not going again this season because the matches are dead rubbers and Slade is not prepared to give youth a chance. Sorry, I meant Warnock, both men are similar, but one wins more games and finishes higher up the table.

Warnock's won thirteen games out of thirty, Slade won seventeen out of forty six last season - even someone with the IQ you accuse jnc90 of having should know which one of the two has the better win rate. If the season had started on the day of Warnock's first game, City would be ninth in the table, so you're right, Slade's team of last season were one place higher than that, but Warnock's team has a better points per game record than Slade's and have got more points than Slade's did after thirty games. Warnock also has given a locally produced youngster a debut in Mark Harris a debut - our current manager has done this in six months, whereas Slade never managed to do it in more than times that long in charge, but then why let the facts get in the way when you've got to defend the fishing expedition you embarked on after the Brentford game?