Interesting post can't wait for the comments.
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Fighting terrorism:
http://news.sky.com/story/theresa-ma...error-10906543
Not supporting it:
https://order-order.com/2017/06/06/c...bers-at-rally/
Interesting post can't wait for the comments.
I would absolutely love to lose all of my human rights, where do I sign up?
Nothing more than a cynical attempt to grab votes from your ukip types. If I'm not mistaken, all but one of the ten terrorists attackers since 2005 were UK born.
I have a problem with this one.
"And I mean doing more to restrict the freedom and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough evidence to know they are a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full in court."
Here's why. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regula...owers_Act_2000 was brought in under the same pretext. But instead it's been routinely used for minor incidents...
Councils launch eight spying ops on Brits A DAY using RIPA
Law designed for spooks, used against smokers - https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/0...gbrotherwatch/
It is weird how easy it is to just change these kind of laws but how hard it is to change the laws that allow millionaires to avoid paying tax.
This is the Theresa we know and love from her Home Secretary days. Internet censorship, elimination of encryption and the destruction of human rights. Just like with the Snoopers Charter, she always returns to her old themes.
She was very wise to deliver this speech to a specially selected group of party members in a sealed off area. And not one Strong & Stable banner in sight
You either support terrorism or you fight it. It's utterly clear.
Depends on his motivation I guess. If (as it appears now) 'anti terror laws' just refers to knee-jerk broad sweeping powers that will a) make no difference and b) be abused, then I agree with him. If it means locking people up without trial just because they are a bit suspicious, then I agree with him.
If you truly believe he voted against it because he 'loves terrorists' then feel free to stick your x wherever you feel is suitable.
Corbyn invited IRA leaders to the House of Commons immediately after the Brighton Bombing, he referred to Hamas & Hezbollah as his friends & despite numerous requests he has consistently refused to condemn the IRA.
In addition John McDonnell thinks that Bobby Sands & co should be honoured & Diane Abbott wanted the British state to be defeated in Northern Ireland.
I don't know about you but I think that there is more than enough evidence there to make a sound judgement on their attitudes towards terrorists.
Or you pretend to fight terrorism whilst you're really intent on stripping away the privacy and civil liberties of your own citizens. What's utterly clear to all except the deliberately blind is you don't fight terrorism by being huge chums with the creator of ISIS and flog them billions worth of arms some of which are given directly to ISIS. Corbyn hasn't clocked this particular Tyrannosaurus rex in the telephone box which suggests he's controlled opposition.
Apart from Corbyn, McDonnell & Abbott do you know of any other senior UK politicians who have referred to terrorist groups as their friends, stood in silence to honour dead IRA terrorists, refuse to condemn the IRA despite being asked on numerous occasions, praised the IRA & advocate honouring them or say that they wanted the British State defeated?
I am sorry but to suggest that a backbench MP like Corbyn had links with these organisations for any reason other than to suck up to them is laughable. Corbyn & McDonnell are republicans, can you work out the link?
Nick = Croesy.