Ive not read all the links - BUT , IF porn was found and not reported / acted upon then it is the
Met Police that should be on a charge of not carrying out their duty. The only person who could have covered this up is The Met Police - as it was them who discovered it , reported it etc.
IF there was evidence that the MP concerned had tried to get the Police or anyone else to cover it up - then obviously there would be a case to answer. The story so far though means there is / was corruption at the Met
(again).
On to the MP - lads - the Law and the courts - they are not a court of Opinion nor is a court of morals - IT is a court of LAW - and if any laws have been broken then the evidence is submitted - cross examined and a jury makes their decision.
Anyone who says there is absolute proof etc - is talking bollox. There are many many ways the log files on a windows PC can be altered, there are many ways in which browsing history can be altered - either by someone else remotely, by an automated malicious script. If I was defending I would want to see the PC in the state it was in when found, what security patches had been applied, I would want exact dates and times of alleged use - and I would cross reference that with Parliamentary activities. I would also want to see the firewall history that should be in place on the Govt network.
Did he ever leave his PC unlocked ? .
The ex cop must know he has no case whatsoever - as he or someone wouldnt have leaked all these details 9 years later. I suspect (and I maybe wrong) the only details he has are his hand written notes.
So if the same ex cop writes down on a piece of paper that Bob Wilson is a secret cross dresser, after meeting him once at his house - would you believe him ? - I think not - and neither would a court of law.
They need to produce much stronger evidence than this. Same as they for all digital evidence cases.
Makes for a nice story though, love a bit of political scandal me. When someone videoed that member of the house of Lords dressed up in a bra smoking a joint - now that is evidence