+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I observed on another thread at the more refined Politics forum that the anti-Semite slur is only ever slung with regard to a relatively minuscule, but extraordinarily influential, group of Semitic people while other Semites and their lands (Gaza, Libya, Syria and Iraq) can be blitzed mercilessly and all the while those doing the bombing never get tagged with the same label.
The best thing for everyone posting in this thread and every other thread about “globalists” is take a week off the Internet, your minds have been poisoned
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php...i-Arabia-today
Thanks for the reply. From a personal perspective, the problem I have with it is that, as far as I can see, the leaders which most represent the views you describe are arrogant, preening populists who always have to have an "enemy" to fight as a means to try to avoid examination into the lack of depth in their policies.
Some super-sized Kosher sausages.
In a broad sense it does.
Nationalism is a country looking after its own interests, regardless on the effects on others
Globalism is countries working together to solve problems that cannot be addressed by individual countries.
If you have your own marked definition for those terms then of course you might not agree
Nationalism is a modern construct that came about with the fairly recent trend of forming individual states. The EU is a state, so joining the EU was all about us giving up our own sovereignty, in favour of integration into a larger state!
I also reject your naive view of globalism.