Quote Originally Posted by Dorcus View Post
There's an ocean of difference between a one off, so called generational, referendum on perhaps the biggest issue since the Second World War which, outrageously, was conducted without the sensible requirement of imposing a supermajority verdict, and a routine GE whose result can be overturned every five years or maybe sooner. That's dynamic and contemporary democracy.
I have said this several times in different threads and very few people seem to have grasped the point you and I have made i.e. Cameron et al should have set a minimum majority verdict of 66.6%. If this was not achieved then the status quo would be preserved.