Quote Originally Posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
Slicing through the waffle, you're dismissive of conspiracy theories you don't like the sound of but you can readily accept a conspiracy theory is true when absent of any proof or evidence to support the claim providing it's 'monolithic' in scale? Or perhaps monolithic isn't enough to convince you though characterising it as 'ruthless' too does the trick? Maybe, just maybe, monolithic and ruthless isn't satisfactory to gain a thumbs-up from you; it requires further totally unsubstantiated assertions like 'vast human and material resources' to have been conscripted to meet your credibility threshold? I'll ensure the breadth of any conspiracy theory I may advance in future will be so gargantuan you'll be certain to lend it your support.
What on earth are you gibbering about this time? What conspiracy theory have I readily accepted?