Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
Yes there have but there are no figers for this one to stae as "A Fact", onlt evidence to support a probable relation ship.

As for the flyer, yes he should have complained but he shouldn't have flown, (making sure his own personal selfish needs were met) and then complained. He should have complained at the time and not put his coleagues at his place of work in extra danger of contamination.

You know quite well that is what I mean but as usual you conveniently choose to ignore it because it doesn't suit you. you will never conced the point os why not just give it a rest?
Is getting to work selfish now? How do you know enough about the situation to make a judgement?

It's beside the point anyway, the airline wasn't operating in a safe manner and needed to be called out on it.