Quote Originally Posted by trampie09 View Post
That 'theconversation' article is not good enough for you when it's based on the topic, oh well that is your problem.

What about the WSJ article then ?, that was full of mathematical equations.
Just because it is "based on the topic" it does not make it factual. I have read the article 4/5 times now (each time you mention it I go back to see if I missed anything). It doesn't cite anything other than based on "evidence in China", evidence it doesn't provide.

I couldn't find the WSJ article. But, again, you think it is true "because it was full of mathematical equations". Send us the link so that I can read it.