Regarding Russian Collusion, the fact you have brought it up hundreds of times and use it against Lardy and Cyril constantly makes me think you regard it as the shining light in your plethora of "victories" which have put us non believers in place. The trouble is that "the Russia collusion hoax" is nothing of the sort really is it?
This article in Time magazine outlines and then debunks eleven "myths" about the Mueller Report
https://time.com/5610317/mueller-rep...ths-breakdown/
and the man himself has said that he "did not evaluate collusion with the Russian government, and confirming that his report did not conclude that there was no obstruction of the probe"
https://www.politico.eu/article/muel...truction-line/
Your belief that there was a hoax when it came to Russian collusion appears to stem from your complete faith in a website which a respected fact checker saw fit to put in its misinformation directory is so telling.
Apart from a link to Conservative Tree House's home page/editorial which you posted on here some years ago that I found condescending and boring, I've never read a single word of it. So, on the one hand, we have someone who goes by what the author of a report says about its findings and what a fact checking site concludes and someone else who totally believes a site deemed to be worthy of a place in said fact checker's disinformation directory and I'm the one who is brainwashed?
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Regarding Russian Collusion, the fact you have brought it up hundreds of times and use it against Lardy and Cyril constantly makes me think you regard it as the shining light in your plethora of "victories" which have put us non believers in place. The trouble is that "the Russia collusion hoax" is nothing of the sort really is it?
Reply With Quote