+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
What’s the point of opening up hotels and campsites, if there’s nothing for visitors to do !!!!
https://apple.news/Ah_8EYmjkRWu6xJfZRBII5w
Yes be careful, but people’s futures are on the line here
He is definitely putting politics before people.
I know what you’re saying with “health before wealth”, but he may be also not taking into account what he is doing to people mentally.
Hopefully I’m wrong, but these times COULD take people to the edge, even suicide !!!!
As I say, hopefully not, but these people down the bay, might not have the business acumen, to make these decisions. They’re pen pushers, nothing more
OEN UP WALES NOW !!!!!
He cant win
It wasnt that long ago people owning tourist attractions were telling people to stay away ! Dont bring the virus here !
Now everyone wants everything opened up
And this is obviously a political post as we have the same old crew having a dig
Hes got the charisma of a wet fish but hes doing the right thing
The effects of this virus on peoples mental health is going to be with us for a long time but it's either lots of people going to their doctors for anti depressants or people dying with a second wave of the virus
As mentioned elsewhere as total deaths and infection rates come down come down the R rate becomes less and less useful as a measure, although never completely so. The figures just need to be closely monitored and action taken when a particular area seems to increase, such as the meat plants in Anglesey. But there, where action should have been taken to control spread he has sat on his hands and done nothing!
Hospitals coped because of the lockdown enforced nationwide not be any particular thing that Mr Drakeford did. But they nearly ran out of PPE and nearly failed to appreciate the spread because of things he and his Minister said they had done or were going to do, and didn't!
Hence the need to be cautious.
Wales has a poorer population than England, and it has an older population, with more health complications. Far less of the elderly population live in leafy suburbs in Wales than in england, which are practically social isolation anyway. An independant study stated that something like out o the 10 most vulnerable towns for an outbreak were in Wales.
We should be being more cautious than England, if we were just following their lead then what would the point of having the assembly be?
England are putting money over lives, and given the above factors it would be even worse for us if we were to follow them.
Some people seem to be jumping on any opportunity to criticise Drakeford because of the party he represents
That's the lockdown enforced by boris and his chummy mates that was way too late and led to us having the highest rate in europe ?
In england not only did they nearly run out of ppe , they actually did ! All down to decisions made by boris
Thank god we didnt have him in charge
My criticisms of him are nothing to do with his party, but basically the man. As sludge said he is a "wet fish" and I think that's putting it kindly. I commented on his lack of gravitas and charisma long ago in other threads. He is as far as appearing as a leader as he could possibly get, and the way he says things and his terminology demonstrates he his basic parochial tendencies. I think we'd have been far better off if Carwyn Jones were still first minister.
But with regard to his party he is not exactly mainstream in that either is he? He was one of the first to endorse JC when he stood for the leadership, and we know how well that went, he is a member of Unite and Unison, both hard left unions, and a member of momentum, which needs no introduction. He is also reputedly (allegedly) a very nasty person. I'm quite sure that if you spoke to a lot of Labour voting welshmen and women privately they would tell you they wish he wasn't there. I do ask my firneds and that is the overwhelming reponse.
All the more reason for Drakeford to remain cautious unlike Free For All Johnson. A few more weeks staying like we are could turn out to be vital, after all this time I’d be devastated if I caught it now because a politician jumped the gun through pressure, it’d be akin to being shot at 5 to 11 on Armistice Day.
Only a couple of months ago lots of people were rounding on Organ Morgan, myself included, over his attitude that the economy mattered, lives didn't. Boris Johnso came under huge fire for his "loved ones are going to die" speech, before deciding on a lockdown.
It's as if we're all a bit bored of not being able to do what we used to do, so everything needs opening up.
We're back at the wealth or health question. England has chosen to go for wealth. The government has decided to ignore scientific advice in part because some people have decided they want to go to pubs, go to the beach etc. Johnson has gone for the popular opinion, which as we all know isn't always the right one.
Drakeford's more cautious approach is one I applaud in part, but there are contradictions in what we can and cannot do. It hasn't been well thought out.
My feeling is now that we should perhaps open up everything. Sod it. I won't be going anywhere. I'll be continuing to keep distancing and protecting me and my family. Those who think they won't be affected can all meet up and form the second wave, like some giant Darwin award.
with regard to your last para there is actually a kernel of sense in that. If things are opened up, those the feel the need can use the facilities, and those like yourself, who don't want to will still be free to make that choice.
So long as the things about the infection that matter are monitored and test and trace is rigorously applied then it should be controllable. It will never be 100% safe and no one can expect that, but if it's manageable then we need to live our lives.
The problem comes when people are told they can go back to work and risk infection and soon will have no choice because of the end of furlough, and at the same time are being told that having put themselves at risk in order to work, they cannot have the freedom of choice to put themselves at risk (or not) for their own personal pleasures in life.
I am glad that Wales has largely been able to plough it's own furrow. Whether we like it or not, devolution has come of age during the pandemic.
I certainly trust Drakeford more than Johnson. I think recent surveys show I am in the majority.
Having said all that, Wales Gov has been placed in an invidious position now that England is effectively unlocked. Also Sturgeon announced yesterday something similar in Scotland.
Radical changes are going to have to he made in Wales, sooner than later.
I for one am going to be very cautious over the next few months. I hope everyone else is.
Leaving aside his charisma (or lack of it) Drakeford’s stance is quite clever. It is always easier to let someone else take the lead in any unusual situation so that if things turn out badly then you can say “well thankfully we were more cautious” and if things turn out well, then you can happily announce that you will now allow similar actions. Win, win surely?
Have we recorded just one new case a month? We are currently recording 50 new cases (of those tested) a day - or 1,500 a month - without counting those not tested. So, we are a long way off your 1 case a month figure.
It's not a football game mate. It's a lot more serious than that.
My sentiments exactly, it is a no-win situation but some are using it to simply have a go at the bloke who is, as you say, a wet-fish. But, he isn't cavalier, and his decisions are not being asterisked with a "These decisions are not risk free" by scientists - unlike Johnson's clearly political motives.
I'd like to see a link on that.
If the R rate is such a poor marker, how come countries like Germany (where the infection and death rates are ACTUALLY low, and not "I'M PROUD OF OUR RECORD" low) - still continue to use it? The r rate is a bad measure when it shows the Government may be getting it wrong. They use the same tactic to avoid the figures on child poverty - quoting the figures that paint them in a favourable light, and not the ones that make them look bad. Similarly, the Opposition do the same in reverse. The R rate is a scientific measure that is useful at all times.
That's completely uncharacteristic of you, to play the man and not the ball - to use a football parlance.
I agree with you completely. The 5 mile rule, whilst I can see what it is trying to achieve, is a complete nonsense for example.
Apparently, when you get bored of it, it just goes away. I wonder what the Government will tell us in the next briefing. Oh, that's right, they don't have them anymore. Result - illusion that this is all over. Result - warnings of second waves.
Instinctively I like the more cautious approach followed by Drakeford. However, Drakeford is not paying for the furlough support or the absence of VAT or income tax receipts so is under far less pressure to get things moving than Johnson. I wonder if the Welsh government were directly affected by the drain on the National Exchequer he would employ a more liberal approach. At the moment I agree with the earlier post; Drakeford is in a win win situation and will be proven right especially if there is a second spike.