+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

Thread: Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS

  1. #4976

    Re: Coronavirus update

    To quote myself from another thread...

    To be fair, think those who are still buying a TV in a shop are unlikely to move to doing it online now if they haven't already made that move on the US version of Black Friday last year/the year before/the year before etc. If this making the public realise that shops need support then hopefully that feeling lasts 17 days and continues into next year because I've also seen comments from bookshop owners about people asking them to research what a book is before being told thanks but the potential customer will now find it online.

    What is essential? What isn't? It's a minefield that could have been avoided without these depressing images, though with a 17 day fire-break as opposed to a 4 week one (NI) we do need tighter restrictions (self-imposed or otherwise) and people to play ball for it to work.

    It's under review now so we'll hear next week what happens.
    Further points:

    i) though this is the most signed petition on the Senedd page not everyone signing will be living in Wales. Davina McCall, one example, is one of the signatures and pretty sure she doesn't live here.

    ii) If you feel angry on behalf of local shops, want to support smaller business but ultimately are going to shop online please consider using alternatives to Amazon:

    Hive – Hive is a brilliant concept, enabling you to buy books, ebooks, DVD & blu-ray, music, stationery and gifts online in much the same way as on Amazon, but with the twist that every time you make a purchase you are supporting your local independent shop. Free UK Delivery on all orders: https://www.hive.co.uk/?wgu=10671_16...ampaign=164105

    Traidcraft – A huge array of Fairtrade products encompassing; groceries, houseware goods, stationery, toys, gifts, christmas decorations, clothing and jewellery: https://www.traidcraftshop.co.uk/

    OnBuy.com – For consumers who want everything in one place in the way Amazon offers it: https://www.onbuy.com/gb/?exta=ethrev

  2. #4977

    Re: Coronavirus update

    thanks for that hive link, I'll check that out

  3. #4978

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    thanks for that hive link, I'll check that out

    Ok honey, bee quick

  4. #4979

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    In a way yes, but this is specifically about shops whereby you were allowed to go into a supermarket and, say, buy a football in the spring, but not allowed to go into a specialist sports shop to do the same thing. The specialist sport shop proprietor knows that there is on line competition seven days a week/fifty two weeks a year, but in the spring, they were not allowed to compete against them or the supermarkets that sold sports goods - the current closures are not perfect for them of course, but, at least, some of the competition would not have the unfair advantage they enjoyed in the spring.
    So why don't you want to remove the unfair advantage from all the competition?

  5. #4980

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by blue matt View Post
    its a joke, lets be honest

    My mum phoned me yesterday ( we speak most days during covid ) and was worried if her kettle breaks, she will have to boil water on the hob

    Now i know she is old, hasnt a lot of think about, so someone phones her, mentioned if the kettle breaks, so she frets about it

    I got on Amazon and sent her one, as a spare, thats one thing less for her to fret about she will find something else today i am sure
    well donebut its what the older generation are like always worry about something

  6. #4981
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy View Post
    So why don't you want to remove the unfair advantage from all the competition?
    What if, say, 75% of the high street retailers have changed their business model to include online sales... Would you want them to suffer twice?

    The whole point of not allowing the sale of non-essential items in shops is to reduce risk. They were never going to please everyone with this policy but stopping online sales too doesn't make any sense to me as the risk is minimal at most.

  7. #4982

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    thanks for that hive link, I'll check that out
    Same here.

  8. #4983

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy View Post
    So why don't you want to remove the unfair advantage from all the competition?
    Because, as I said earlier, it's all about keeping contact between people in shops down as low as possible - even if it could be done, stopping online sales in a situation where the aim is to cut numbers in shops and the amount of time people spend in them would be ludicrous, is that what you're proposing?

  9. #4984

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    What if, say, 75% of the high street retailers have changed their business model to include online sales... Would you want them to suffer twice?

    The whole point of not allowing the sale of non-essential items in shops is to reduce risk. They were never going to please everyone with this policy but stopping online sales too doesn't make any sense to me as the risk is minimal at most.
    I don't want them to suffer at all and I don't want to restrict online sales. I'm just wondering why some people support imposing these restrictions on supermarkets to mitigate the situation for small shops, but don't want to impose them on other retailers.

    I'd also like to know how much the risk is reduced by preventing supermarkets, which are already open, from selling their full range of goods.

  10. #4985

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Because, as I said earlier, it's all about keeping contact between people in shops down as low as possible - even if it could be done, stopping online sales in a situation where the aim is to cut numbers in shops and the amount of time people spend in them would be ludicrous, is that what you're proposing?
    Didn't you write that the logic behind the decision was to stop small shops being discriminated against?

  11. #4986

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy View Post
    I thought you wrote that the logic behind the decision was to stop small shops being discriminated against?
    Round and round in circles because you want to score party political points - I said that I could understand the logic whereby they didn't want to see smaller, independent traders discriminated against like they were first time around because supermarkets had an unfair advantage over them. Nothing you're saying is making me think I was wrong in thinking that (quite the opposite in fact).

    Therefore, there's no point in continuing this discussion.

  12. #4987
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy View Post
    I don't want them to suffer at all and I don't want to restrict online sales. I'm just wondering why some people support imposing these restrictions on supermarkets to mitigate the situation for small shops, but don't want to impose them on other retailers.

    I'd also like to know how much the risk is reduced by preventing supermarkets, which are already open, from selling their full range of goods.
    I know you don't want them to suffer at all, that's why I don't see the logic of talking about stopping online retail too.

    You're right, I think it would be very beneficial for quantifiable evidence of how much risk would be reduced by not allowing non-essential items to be sold in supermarkets, but it does make sense that people who would only be going to the stores to buy non-essential items won't be going there now. That would obviously reduce the chance of people coming into contact with the virus as the less people there are in an enclosed environment, the better.

  13. #4988

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    I know you don't want them to suffer at all, that's why I don't see the logic of talking about stopping online retail too.

    You're right, I think it would be very beneficial for quantifiable evidence of how much risk would be reduced by not allowing non-essential items to be sold in supermarkets, but it does make sense that people who would only be going to the stores to buy non-essential items won't be going there now. That would obviously reduce the chance of people coming into contact with the virus as the less people there are in an enclosed environment, the better.
    What about the "Ozone lot", moaning about all these deliveries ??

  14. #4989

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by poc View Post
    well donebut its what the older generation are like always worry about something
    its bloody crazy to be honest, but it made me laugh as i addressed it to " My Mum whose kettle might break , Barry "
    so it gave me a bit of a laugh and will keep my mum from fretting over it

  15. #4990
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUETIT View Post
    What about the "Ozone lot", moaning about all these deliveries ??
    Are they? That's news to me, Tone.

    I would have thought it would actually reduce carbon emissions by having a finite number of people doing deliveries to numerous addresses rather than everyone using their own vehicles and public transport to travel to and from the shops.

  16. #4991

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    Are they? That's news to me, Tone.

    I would have thought it would actually reduce carbon emissions by having a finite number of people doing deliveries to numerous addresses rather than everyone using their own vehicles and public transport to travel to and from the shops.
    My cars travelled 36 miles since March

    Can someone go and bring it back to me please

  17. #4992

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by blue matt View Post
    its bloody crazy to be honest, but it made me laugh as i addressed it to " My Mum whose kettle might break , Barry "
    so it gave me a bit of a laugh and will keep my mum from fretting over it
    If I was her id be ringing you today saying Matt im worried my TV will break.

    A new 65 inch will do as a spare.

  18. #4993

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    I know you don't want them to suffer at all, that's why I don't see the logic of talking about stopping online retail too.

    You're right, I think it would be very beneficial for quantifiable evidence of how much risk would be reduced by not allowing non-essential items to be sold in supermarkets, but it does make sense that people who would only be going to the stores to buy non-essential items won't be going there now. That would obviously reduce the chance of people coming into contact with the virus as the less people there are in an enclosed environment, the better.
    It seems to me that the restrictions have pissed off a lot of people for minimal gain, unless supermarkets are thought to be hotbeds of infection.

  19. #4994
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUETIT View Post
    My cars travelled 36 miles since March

    Can someone go and bring it back to me please
    Congratulations... I think

  20. #4995
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy View Post
    It seems to me that the restrictions have pissed off a lot of people for minimal gain, unless supermarkets are thought to be hotbeds of infection.
    That's fair enough. I get the point of what they're trying to achieve, as well as a lot of others seem to do. But there are equally a lot of people who don't understand it (and a lot who will choose not to), so it will just come to an impasse in debate because those on either side of the argument will not be able to concede on it.

  21. #4996

    Re: Coronavirus update

    God knows why “they” feel the need to state this now.....

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...ikely-19162353

    I know it’s Wales online and we have better journo’s (and scientists ) on here, but is there any reason to state this just as we start another one? I guess January is a good time for it as most folks dont do much and no one really goes out bar students......

    Besides, the vaccine will be out by then anyway.....

  22. #4997

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    God knows why “they” feel the need to state this now.....

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...ikely-19162353

    I know it’s Wales online and we have better journo’s (and scientists ) on here, but is there any reason to state this just as we start another one? I guess January is a good time for it as most folks dont do much and no one really goes out bar students......

    Besides, the vaccine will be out by then anyway.....
    Although the vaccine is planned to be available for frontline NHS staff in December it will take many months before the population as a whole will be inoculated. And of course there will be many refusniks. The real spike will occur when students return home for Christmas.

  23. #4998

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Round and round in circles because you want to score party political points - I said that I could understand the logic whereby they didn't want to see smaller, independent traders discriminated against like they were first time around because supermarkets had an unfair advantage over them. Nothing you're saying is making me think I was wrong in thinking that (quite the opposite in fact).

    Therefore, there's no point in continuing this discussion.
    There's people who will grizzle over anything Bob! I think you're absolutely right with your logic about why the Senedd has implemented this rule.

    In these trying times nothing is perfect but the Welsh Government is trying to be fair to smaller retailers while minimising the risk of contagion. This firebreak is only for 17 days, I can't think of anything people can't do without in that time, while simultaneously showing solidarity with smaller traders. People can buy food, booze and bog rolls, what more do they want?

  24. #4999

    Re: Coronavirus update

    [QUOTE=Dorcus;5129555]There's people who will grizzle over anything Bob! I think you're absolutely right with your logic about why the Senedd has implemented this rule.

    In these trying times nothing is perfect but the Welsh Government is trying to be fair to smaller retailers while minimising the risk of contagion. This firebreak is only for 17 days, I can't think of anything people couldn't desperately do without in that time, while simultaneously showing solidarity with smaller traders. Whatever happened to "we're in this together"? People can buy food, booze and bog rolls, what more do they want?

  25. #5000

    Re: Coronavirus update

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUETIT View Post
    What about the "Ozone lot", moaning about all these deliveries ??
    who's the ozone lot? never heard that term before

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •