
Originally Posted by
olderblue
We all want the City to win every game, we get frustrated when they don't, although ive never been critical of the team when they have given everything
Everyone one of us has an opinion on the team, the set up and the style of Football we play.
The style and the manner in which we lost at Coventry is bound to attract criticism of the manager and the players, if from that defeat and the poor return of results prior to that, it has forced a change in style and set up then happy days, it's a win win situation.
Today for me that was our best performance of the season, we took the game to Watford who were a top 3 side and best them, in fact we could have had two penalties awarded, I've seen them given for less and beat them convincingly
More importantly you look at the changes that have helped those results to happen and pointing out the glaringly obvious differences that Pack wasn't starting isn't a negative it's a fact.
If we had a RB then the two competing for the midfield would be 2 of three withdrawals Vaulks and Bacuna, I doubt Pack would get a look in
We look better without him, we move the ball forward without him and we move the ball quicker without him
Results dont lie, bringing him on for 10-15 minutes to close the game down, I understand
Starting him has cost us in my view and rather than persisting with him, when results were poor the manager should have identified the problem and acted on it
He know has and the results have improved dramatically