"Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

[the other bob wilson]

Now, if the Daily Mail made a claim that a left wing Prime Minister had said that while the country was in the middle of a pandemic, I'd dismiss it because of who was publishing the quote, so I shouldn't get too over excited about it just because it's supposed to have been said by the clown currently occupying 10 Downing Street. However, this has to have the potential to cause Johnson tremendous damage if it turns out that it is generally accepted to be true.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9510133/Boris-Johnson-said-bodies-pile-high-order-lockdown-sources-claim.html

[Harry Paget Flashman]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

Now, if the Daily Mail made a claim that a left wing Prime Minister had said that while the country was in the middle of a pandemic, I'd dismiss it because of who was publishing the quote, so I shouldn't get too over excited about it just because it's supposed to have been said by the clown currently occupying 10 Downing Street. However, this has to have the potential to cause Johnson tremendous damage if it turns out that it is generally accepted to be true.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ces-claim.html

Damaging to people with integrity maybe.

This lot will just shrug their shoulders and carrying on laughing at the plebs.

[surge]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

Two stories from the Mail trending on twitter:

i) the one you've mentioned about Boris Johnson today
ii) an Emily Crane story from Thursday the 22nd which has "dishonestly connected Biden’s climate plan with a not-at-all-about-Biden study" which has been picked up by Fox Business and Donald Trump Jnr.

Two stories about Boris Johnson as well:

i) the one you've mentioned today
ii) that his chief of staff Dan Rosenfield knew about the Super League from meeting with Ed Woodward on Wednesday the 21st where apparently Rosenfield told Woodward that Downing Street would not stand in way of SL plan - understood to be without Boris' knowledge who then instructed Eddie Lister to communicate Boris' disapproval directly to some SL backers

That would be the second story about Eddie Lister this week who unexpectedly stood down on Friday 23rd due to what appears to be a rather extreme case of "conflict of interest": https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/e...tion-pfdzfj7gt

Stood down as opposed to Cummings (close friends with Gove) who was removed late last year but blogged on Friday the 23rd or Johnny Mercer who was sacked apparently by text (Tuesday the 20th) and went onto described Number 10 as "a cesspit full of snakes and cowards" later in the week.

It appears to have been a sensational (less than a) week for The Mail, Boris and his staff/former staff. In other news, Tories are still x points ahead in the latest poll

[surge]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

David Cameron's quite a lucky boy all this has been happening so soon after his emerging lobbying scandal.

[insider]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

They literally killed your Granny last year and still the capitalist suck johnson's shite up.

[Rjk]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

EW54-lhXQAASZZb.jpg

so many times this could apply to the parties here

[surge]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

More from Dan Hodges (employee of the mail):

Could Cabinet Ministers please drop this line "the Prime Minister is solely focussed on managing Covid and other important national issues". He isn't. If he had been, he wouldn't have taken the time on Thursday evening to phone round personally briefing against Dom Cummings.

This was regarding their thinking that Cummings had leaked the Dyson text showing how Boris is willing to fix tax laws for friends. At what point does that "we can't govern banner" belong in the 'Republican' conference room as well?

[Former Labour leader]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

Two stories from the Mail trending on twitter:

i) the one you've mentioned about Boris Johnson today
ii) an Emily Crane story from Thursday the 22nd which has "dishonestly connected Biden’s climate plan with a not-at-all-about-Biden study" which has been picked up by Fox Business and Donald Trump Jnr.

Two stories about Boris Johnson as well:

i) the one you've mentioned today
ii) that his chief of staff Dan Rosenfield knew about the Super League from meeting with Ed Woodward on Wednesday the 21st where apparently Rosenfield told Woodward that Downing Street would not stand in way of SL plan - understood to be without Boris' knowledge who then instructed Eddie Lister to communicate Boris' disapproval directly to some SL backers

That would be the second story about Eddie Lister this week who unexpectedly stood down on Friday 23rd due to what appears to be a rather extreme case of "conflict of interest": https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/e...tion-pfdzfj7gt

Stood down as opposed to Cummings (close friends with Gove) who was removed late last year but blogged on Friday the 23rd or Johnny Mercer who was sacked apparently by text (Tuesday the 20th) and went onto described Number 10 as "a cesspit full of snakes and cowards" later in the week.

It appears to have been a sensational (less than a) week for The Mail, Boris and his staff/former staff. In other news, Tories are still x points ahead in the latest poll

Some surprising Daily Mail readers on here.😀

[life on mars]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

There has to be a body of truth to this , let's hear the recordings I say , anyways what about the flat refurb ,was it John Lewis ?

[jon1959]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

I'm sure this has been posted on one or another thread last month, but worth putting up again:

[the other bob wilson]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9514075/Prime-Minister-siege-fresh-sources-confirm-crass-comment-lockdown-deaths.html

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...wn-deaths.html

What is also a damning indictment of Johnson's credibility is that the BBC and ITV published reports of his words as fact based on the word of their sources rather than accept the denial by the Prime Minister of the UK and his Official Spokesperson.

[Rjk]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

What is also a damning indictment of Johnson's credibility is that the BBC and ITV published reports of his words as fact based on the word of their sources rather than accept the denial by the Prime Minister of the UK and his Official Spokesperson.

That's because he's a liar. He's been sacked for lying twice.

It's hard to imagine anyone less suitable to be a prime minister.

[Eric Cartman]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

What is also a damning indictment of Johnson's credibility is that the BBC and ITV published reports of his words as fact based on the word of their sources rather than accept the denial by the Prime Minister of the UK and his Official Spokesperson.

Can't help but think all this seems a little convenient. Number 10 hang Cameron, Hancock and a few others out to dry with greensill and then a week later boris is facing questions of his own and the press seems completely free to report unlike usual.

No wonder so many died compared to other island nations when our government is too busy playing games like this.

[Eric Cartman]

Re: "Let the bodies pile high in their thousands".

That's because he's a liar. He's been sacked for lying twice.

It's hard to imagine anyone less suitable to be a prime minister.

Johnson has lied lots of times whilst being prime minister and the BBC has chosen not to report it as such.