Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
If the truth is "somewhere in the middle" which parts of what he was saying do you not believe?

Because there is an awful lot of evidence out there for a lot of it.

the "herd immunity" policy
Hancock lying about all people being returned to care homes being tested first
10s of thousands of people needlessly died
which parts aren't you convinced by?
I struggle to believe factually anything he says, as everybody did when he went to Durham. I read an article today written by someone woo has worked with him who says he has enormous difficulty in actually admitting he is in any way responsible for when something goes wrong even when he is part of the team, and he pointed out that he did exactly the same in the committee, he apologised initially and from then on blamed everyone but himself.
There is almost certainly kernels of truth in what he says but finding them when you take away the bile lack of any admission of real fault and the revenge and you'd be hard pushed to find them.
In a few months he will be forgotten. And if he keeps coming back with more 'Revelations' he will become less and less plausible.
If he felt so strongly about everything why didn't he resign and go to the press at the time? That alone questions his motives if not his veracity.
there may be proof out there, but this modern information world being what it is for every piece of information that says A there will be another that say B.
I wouldn't like to be the person with the job of unravelling it all and coming up with the real answers at the end of it all.

And now I'm going to the pub - - because I can But God knows for how long!