Quote Originally Posted by Optimistic Nick View Post
Easy to dismiss as money grabbing, but I can sort of sympathise with the fact he was born into something he was famous for with no say in the matter. See also: royals.


doesn't mean he should get paid, rather that his anonymity might have been preserved until he was old enough to be told and could decide what to do about it.
I hate the way the US legal system (and probably others) works though. Instead of the argument being about what it is really about - presumably this guy thinks he should have been paid more money for the photo. But they have to trump up the claims to make it about Child pornography, which is clearly bogus.