Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Collapse
X
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
They were 17 ?Originally posted by dembethewarrior View Post
I am amazed he wasn't spoken to by the police about these matters
Maybe they cautioned him ?
If any of the learners were under 16 then he's surely got to be cautioned ?
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
The accusations were also handed to South Wales Police who the hearing was told conducted an investigation and that no further action was taken.Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View PostThey were 17 ?
I am amazed he wasn't spoken to by the police about these matters
Maybe they cautioned him ?
If any of the learners were under 16 then he's surely got to be cautioned ?
Maybe underage was the wrong wording. Definitely inappropriate. I'm 35 you won't catch me dead talking to even a 21 year old, nothing wrong with it in the eyes of the law but that's a no no for me. Younger than one of my niece and nephews ffs.
17 year old? Not a ****ing chance. Blokes a wrongun.
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
You may think so and I may agree but if she is 17 there is no offence unless he was in a position of trust regarding her.Originally posted by dembethewarrior View PostThe accusations were also handed to South Wales Police who the hearing was told conducted an investigation and that no further action was taken.
Maybe underage was the wrong wording. Definitely inappropriate. I'm 35 you won't catch me dead talking to even a 21 year old, nothing wrong with it in the eyes of the law but that's a no no for me. Younger than one of my niece and nephews ffs.
17 year old? Not a ****ing chance. Blokes a wrongun.
The line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you want it set?
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
You would be polite to a 17 year old, You can think blimey she's attractive .Originally posted by dembethewarrior View PostThe accusations were also handed to South Wales Police who the hearing was told conducted an investigation and that no further action was taken.
Maybe underage was the wrong wording. Definitely inappropriate. I'm 35 you won't catch me dead talking to even a 21 year old, nothing wrong with it in the eyes of the law but that's a no no for me. Younger than one of my niece and nephews ffs.
17 year old? Not a ****ing chance. Blokes a wrongun.
But sending them suggestive messages ?
If a 21 year old student offered you sex as a 40 year old you would be flattered but surely you would be a good guy and say I am twice your age ?
But to be in a position of authority and trust and be sending sexualised texts to a 17 year old ?
He's lost his job . It's totally inappropriate but it's clearly not illegal or the bloke would be under arrest 🤔
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
I agree but he was her tutor ?Originally posted by xsnaggle View PostYou may think so and I may agree but if she is 17 there is no offence unless he was in a position of trust regarding her.
The line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you want it set?
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
The hearin during his employment as a work-based learning practitioner Byard would oversee around 40 learners on a day to day basis, aged between 16 and 18-years-old.g heard how
so a grown man (now 31 ) sending "sexually motivated" messages to a 16 yr old
Christian is a UEFA B Licence coach, an FAW Coach Educator and by day is a Lecturer at the Cardiff City Foundation
This is a guy in a position of trust, A shame he will not do time, as he deserves it
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
When I was at school one of the teachers , in his forties , had an affair with a sixth former who was 17 at the time .Originally posted by blue matt View PostThe hearin during his employment as a work-based learning practitioner Byard would oversee around 40 learners on a day to day basis, aged between 16 and 18-years-old.g heard how
so a grown man (now 31 ) sending "sexually motivated" messages to a 16 yr old
Christian is a UEFA B Licence coach, an FAW Coach Educator and by day is a Lecturer at the Cardiff City Foundation
This is a guy in a position of trust, A shame he will not do time, as he deserves it
He's lucky as these days because he was in a position of trust he would be in trouble
You would think
But if this bloke sent sexual messages to girls over the age of consent but he was their tutor surely he breaches his position of trust ?
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Agreed and it may be excellent grounds for sacking but whether it is criminal is another matter also did the girl(s) reply and cod what they replied have encouraged him. Remember over 16 they are of the age of consent .Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View PostWhen I was at school one of the teachers , in his forties , had an affair with a sixth former who was 17 at the time .
He's lucky as these days because he was in a position of trust he would be in trouble
You would think
But if this bloke sent sexual messages to girls over the age of consent but he was their tutor surely he breaches his position of trust ?
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
If it was criminal I think he would have been arrestedOriginally posted by xsnaggle View PostAgreed and it may be excellent grounds for sacking but whether it is criminal is another matter also did the girl(s) reply and cod what they replied have encouraged him. Remember over 16 they are of the age of consent .
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
There was a loophole closed in March 2021 where coaches were not considered to be in positions of trust, like teachers etc.
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
He was her coach. Isn't that someone you should trust not to behave inappropriately?Originally posted by xsnaggle View PostYou may think so and I may agree but if she is 17 there is no offence unless he was in a position of trust regarding her.
The line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you want it set?
I've said it isn't against the law. It's still ****ing weird mind.
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
Did the girl encourage him???? Are you for bloody real. Just read that back again and take a long hard look at yourself. In a week when the headlines have been full of stories about Sarah Everard and girls and women being afraid to walk the streets on their own this is your take on this story. Hang your head in shame.Originally posted by xsnaggle View PostAgreed and it may be excellent grounds for sacking but whether it is criminal is another matter also did the girl(s) reply and cod what they replied have encouraged him. Remember over 16 they are of the age of consent .
Comment
-
Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls
I've almost become immune to the scumbags like him now. What gets me as or more angry are the idiots who didn't sack him. When presented with that evidence, who in their right minds think 'we'll just give him an informal warning'. They're guilty of letting him get away with it.
Edited
Comment
Quick Navigation
Collapse

Comment