Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

    Christian Byard was proved of unacceptable professional conduct after sending inappropriate messages which were "sexually motivated" to learners at Cardiff CityFC community foundation

  • #2
    Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

    They were 17 ?

    I am amazed he wasn't spoken to by the police about these matters

    Maybe they cautioned him ?

    If any of the learners were under 16 then he's surely got to be cautioned ?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

      He was in a position of trust and power, which he abused for his own nefarious motives, he's a wrong un and should be quite rightly be dealt with by the courts system.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

        Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
        They were 17 ?

        I am amazed he wasn't spoken to by the police about these matters

        Maybe they cautioned him ?

        If any of the learners were under 16 then he's surely got to be cautioned ?
        The accusations were also handed to South Wales Police who the hearing was told conducted an investigation and that no further action was taken.



        Maybe underage was the wrong wording. Definitely inappropriate. I'm 35 you won't catch me dead talking to even a 21 year old, nothing wrong with it in the eyes of the law but that's a no no for me. Younger than one of my niece and nephews ffs.

        17 year old? Not a ****ing chance. Blokes a wrongun.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

          Originally posted by dembethewarrior View Post
          The accusations were also handed to South Wales Police who the hearing was told conducted an investigation and that no further action was taken.



          Maybe underage was the wrong wording. Definitely inappropriate. I'm 35 you won't catch me dead talking to even a 21 year old, nothing wrong with it in the eyes of the law but that's a no no for me. Younger than one of my niece and nephews ffs.

          17 year old? Not a ****ing chance. Blokes a wrongun.
          You may think so and I may agree but if she is 17 there is no offence unless he was in a position of trust regarding her.
          The line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you want it set?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

            Originally posted by dembethewarrior View Post
            The accusations were also handed to South Wales Police who the hearing was told conducted an investigation and that no further action was taken.



            Maybe underage was the wrong wording. Definitely inappropriate. I'm 35 you won't catch me dead talking to even a 21 year old, nothing wrong with it in the eyes of the law but that's a no no for me. Younger than one of my niece and nephews ffs.

            17 year old? Not a ****ing chance. Blokes a wrongun.
            You would be polite to a 17 year old, You can think blimey she's attractive .

            But sending them suggestive messages ?

            If a 21 year old student offered you sex as a 40 year old you would be flattered but surely you would be a good guy and say I am twice your age ?

            But to be in a position of authority and trust and be sending sexualised texts to a 17 year old ?

            He's lost his job . It's totally inappropriate but it's clearly not illegal or the bloke would be under arrest 🤔

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

              Originally posted by xsnaggle View Post
              You may think so and I may agree but if she is 17 there is no offence unless he was in a position of trust regarding her.
              The line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you want it set?
              I agree but he was her tutor ?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                The hearin during his employment as a work-based learning practitioner Byard would oversee around 40 learners on a day to day basis, aged between 16 and 18-years-old.g heard how

                so a grown man (now 31 ) sending "sexually motivated" messages to a 16 yr old

                Christian is a UEFA B Licence coach, an FAW Coach Educator and by day is a Lecturer at the Cardiff City Foundation


                This is a guy in a position of trust, A shame he will not do time, as he deserves it

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                  Originally posted by blue matt View Post
                  The hearin during his employment as a work-based learning practitioner Byard would oversee around 40 learners on a day to day basis, aged between 16 and 18-years-old.g heard how

                  so a grown man (now 31 ) sending "sexually motivated" messages to a 16 yr old

                  Christian is a UEFA B Licence coach, an FAW Coach Educator and by day is a Lecturer at the Cardiff City Foundation


                  This is a guy in a position of trust, A shame he will not do time, as he deserves it
                  When I was at school one of the teachers , in his forties , had an affair with a sixth former who was 17 at the time .

                  He's lucky as these days because he was in a position of trust he would be in trouble

                  You would think

                  But if this bloke sent sexual messages to girls over the age of consent but he was their tutor surely he breaches his position of trust ?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                    Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                    When I was at school one of the teachers , in his forties , had an affair with a sixth former who was 17 at the time .

                    He's lucky as these days because he was in a position of trust he would be in trouble

                    You would think

                    But if this bloke sent sexual messages to girls over the age of consent but he was their tutor surely he breaches his position of trust ?
                    Agreed and it may be excellent grounds for sacking but whether it is criminal is another matter also did the girl(s) reply and cod what they replied have encouraged him. Remember over 16 they are of the age of consent .

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                      Originally posted by xsnaggle View Post
                      Agreed and it may be excellent grounds for sacking but whether it is criminal is another matter also did the girl(s) reply and cod what they replied have encouraged him. Remember over 16 they are of the age of consent .
                      If it was criminal I think he would have been arrested

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                        There was a loophole closed in March 2021 where coaches were not considered to be in positions of trust, like teachers etc.

                        The government will close a "loophole" in the law that allows sports coaches and other people in positions of power to have sex with 16 and 17-year-olds in their care.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                          Originally posted by xsnaggle View Post
                          You may think so and I may agree but if she is 17 there is no offence unless he was in a position of trust regarding her.
                          The line has to be drawn somewhere. Where do you want it set?
                          He was her coach. Isn't that someone you should trust not to behave inappropriately?

                          I've said it isn't against the law. It's still ****ing weird mind.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                            Originally posted by xsnaggle View Post
                            Agreed and it may be excellent grounds for sacking but whether it is criminal is another matter also did the girl(s) reply and cod what they replied have encouraged him. Remember over 16 they are of the age of consent .
                            Did the girl encourage him???? Are you for bloody real. Just read that back again and take a long hard look at yourself. In a week when the headlines have been full of stories about Sarah Everard and girls and women being afraid to walk the streets on their own this is your take on this story. Hang your head in shame.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Former city foundation worker messages underage girls

                              I've almost become immune to the scumbags like him now. What gets me as or more angry are the idiots who didn't sack him. When presented with that evidence, who in their right minds think 'we'll just give him an informal warning'. They're guilty of letting him get away with it.


                              Edited

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X