I dunno
Ask Stoke supporters.
Or Coventry (I know he has been there a while) How much has he spent?
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Any decent manager would want to bring their own ideas and want the money to make it happen without meddling from above.
That isn't going to happen is it? Tan and his men won't keep their noses out, they won't give the money for a manager to make meaningful changes to the team and squad and if anything they'll be making even more cuts now the crowds are going down. They'll probably wonder what has happened when the season ticket numbers take a hit next season.
In short, what is the point bringing in somebody if they are working with the owners and board anyway.
The more I'm thinking how incompetent the owner and board is the more I think why not just stick with Mick. At least he's got some experience.
Not been so downbeat about the club in quite some time and it is all down to the lack of interest from the owner and the people who are so say running our club.
I dunno
Ask Stoke supporters.
Or Coventry (I know he has been there a while) How much has he spent?
so who is gonna stop this freefall if MM can't? how many more visits to the last chance saloon?
I honestly do not know.
You could have Pep Guardiola in charge of this squad and he wouldn't get a great deal out of them if his instructions were loan out anybody and use the kids because he has to.
Until there is a change of owner or change of thinking by the owner then I see no point getting anybody else.
Seems to be working out for Forest.
We've gone from a possible crack at the play offs a few weeks ago to it is maybe fine to stay up and bring through the kids and cut costs to almost certainly being nearer the drop zone than we are comfortable with. All within a few weeks.
It is worrying.
New manager kick on ? Flynn on the way just seen outside Greggs with a beefy bake in hand .
There is no point doing anything is there. Ever.
Crikey.
A change at forest seems to have worked.
Are you saying that we are not playing more kids this season than previously?
I believe we are and the reason being because he has to. Either because he needs to because he has nobody else to play or has been asked by the owner to play them by hook or by crook.
I think Mick is just trotting out the party line to stay in the good books of the powers that be at the club.
He isn't going to say 'The club are tighter than a submarine door and our squad is threadbare' is he? He would be out on his 'arris the day after.
Don't get me wrong here, some of our senior pros have been as bad as anybody. We don't just start producing kids that are good enough just because we decide to go with youth though. Sorry, it doesn't happen like that.
Is the cost cutting, playing kids and letting players leave without replacing them working? Look at the league table.