What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

[blue lewj]

What would stop VT doing similar to what Hammam did?

These owners don't exactly publicise the facts of their true intentions while still at the club. Usually not until they have left the club and you suddenly see the other side of their character.
Sam Hammam changed from loveable, fun owner to the clubs main enemy almost overnight. What would stop VT doing something similar?

It seems beyond odd that an owner has had interest in others buying the club and blankly refused to even entertain them (info from recent meetings with Dalman) but seems content on cutting club expenses in any way they can while still pumping money in.
It all seems very odd. Why would somebody like VT hold onto a club like Cardiff City on it's current inevitable (due to the above mentioned cost cutting) slide.

[UNDERHILL1927]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

Good questions mate. The blind faith some people have in Tan (mainly because they nailed their literal colours to the mast 9 years ago and are too stubborn to back track) is ridiculous.

Tan can say all he wants but none of really know what is going on (and neither should we have to be overly concerned) but....the extreme lack of trust in anyone running the football club means we are worried

[blue lewj]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

Good questions mate. The blind faith some people have in Tan (mainly because they nailed their literal colours to the mast 9 years ago and are too stubborn to back track) is ridiculous.

Tan can say all he wants but none of really know what is going on (and neither should we have to be overly concerned) but....the extreme lack of trust in anyone running the football club means we are worried

It just seems odd to me.

If your average bloke on the street had a house that was falling into a state of disrepair that you were sinking money into that you wouldn't see back and you were offered a half decent amount you'd snap their hand off.

Why is he keeping hold of a club he is no longer interested in, seems to have no intention of pushing for promotion with anytime soon and is costing him millions a month personally? One that will lose value and continue to do so with the 'plans' we have in place that is basically spend nothing on it while slowly sliding down the leagues. All this on top of his other business losses.

[UNDERHILL1927]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

It just seems odd to me.

If your average bloke on the street had a house that was falling into a state of disrepair that you were sinking money into that you wouldn't see back and you were offered a half decent amount you'd snap their hand off.

Why is he keeping hold of a club he is no longer interested in, seems to have no intention of pushing for promotion with anytime soon and is costing him millions a month personally? One that will lose value and continue to do so with the 'plans' we have in place that is basically spend nothing on it while slowly sliding down the leagues. All this on top of his other business losses.

I don't know enough about the actual offers that may or may not have been put on the table. If we did have any solid offers (Hammam aside) then I concur, seems ridiculous he didn't take them.

[blue lewj]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

I don't know enough about the actual offers that may or may not have been put on the table. If we did have any solid offers (Hammam aside) then I concur, seems ridiculous he didn't take them.

Surely any offer would at least be considered if it is costing him the amounts they have said it is.
Add to the fact he isn't looking to turn us into a club that is in danger of increasing in value any time soon.

Why would somebody keep hold of a club that is costing them millions per month and decreasing in value and league placings?

[delmbox]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

It just seems odd to me.

If your average bloke on the street had a house that was falling into a state of disrepair that you were sinking money into that you wouldn't see back and you were offered a half decent amount you'd snap their hand off.

Why is he keeping hold of a club he is no longer interested in, seems to have no intention of pushing for promotion with anytime soon and is costing him millions a month personally? One that will lose value and continue to do so with the 'plans' we have in place that is basically spend nothing on it while slowly sliding down the leagues. All this on top of his other business losses.

Ok, agreed, he might screw us over.

Now what?

[JumpersforGoalposts]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

What would stop VT doing similar to what Hammam did?

These owners don't exactly publicise the facts of their true intentions while still at the club. Usually not until they have left the club and you suddenly see the other side of their character.
Sam Hammam changed from loveable, fun owner to the clubs main enemy almost overnight. What would stop VT doing something similar?

It seems beyond odd that an owner has had interest in others buying the club and blankly refused to even entertain them (info from recent meetings with Dalman) but seems content on cutting club expenses in any way they can while still pumping money in.
It all seems very odd. Why would somebody like VT hold onto a club like Cardiff City on it's current inevitable (due to the above mentioned cost cutting) slide.

He's an ageing multi-millionaire (to the tune of the best part of a billion) and is probably now focused on his personal legacy "issues".
He probably won't sell unless it shows his stewardship of the club to have been a positive thing.

[Hilts]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

I doubt theres been any serious offers and I bet one is from someone suing us.

[Former Labour leader]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

He's an ageing multi-millionaire (to the tune of the best part of a billion) and is probably now focused on his personal legacy "issues".
He probably won't sell unless it shows his stewardship of the club to have been a positive thing.

I tend to agree with you. His Malaysian heritage and culture will have a lot to do with it. He will not be thinking along the same lines as a Brit.

[gabbsthenewt]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

It seems beyond odd that an owner has had interest in others buying the club and blankly refused to even entertain them

At least he's not comp-ing the bar at Kiwis for fake millionaires pretending to want to buy us :hehe:

_47173328_rids_steele_huw.jpg

[stan butler]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

What would stop VT doing similar to what Hammam did?

These owners don't exactly publicise the facts of their true intentions while still at the club. Usually not until they have left the club and you suddenly see the other side of their character.
Sam Hammam changed from loveable, fun owner to the clubs main enemy almost overnight. What would stop VT doing something similar?

It seems beyond odd that an owner has had interest in others buying the club and blankly refused to even entertain them (info from recent meetings with Dalman) but seems content on cutting club expenses in any way they can while still pumping money in.
It all seems very odd. Why would somebody like VT hold onto a club like Cardiff City on it's current inevitable (due to the above mentioned cost cutting) slide.

We won't know until he goes and he doesn't say bugger all so we are in the dark at present.
Unlike Hammam who was sussed by many long before he went..

[stan butler]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

At least he's not comp-ing the bar at Kiwis for fake millionaires pretending to want to buy us :hehe:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4625[/ATTACH]

I remember that fella from Jersey or similar?
And who can forget Jim Cadman :hehe:

[NYCBlue]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

He's an ageing multi-millionaire (to the tune of the best part of a billion) and is probably now focused on his personal legacy "issues".
He probably won't sell unless it shows his stewardship of the club to have been a positive thing.

If I was so concerned about my legacy, I'd be a bit more careful about my decision making and if I was in a situation like Tan is at Cardiff City I'd start looking for the best people to guide me and I'd listen to what they were saying. Tan seems like the kind of person that's so focused on himself that he hasn't begun to consider a world that he's no longer the centre of.

[stan butler]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

If I was so concerned about my legacy, I'd be a bit more careful about my decision making and if I was in a situation like Tan is at Cardiff City I'd start looking for the best people to guide me and I'd listen to what they were saying. Tan seems like the kind of person that's so focused on himself that he hasn't begun to consider a world that he's no longer the centre of.

Well said

[blue lewj]

Re: What would stop Tan doing a 'Hammam' if he chose to do so?

If I was so concerned about my legacy, I'd be a bit more careful about my decision making and if I was in a situation like Tan is at Cardiff City I'd start looking for the best people to guide me and I'd listen to what they were saying. Tan seems like the kind of person that's so focused on himself that he hasn't begun to consider a world that he's no longer the centre of.

This is the reason for my original post.

It defies logic to keep ploughing money and accumulating debt for a club you've lost interest in and seem way past your intention to push them to the next level.

I hope it is a vanity thing because this could be Hammam on a whole bigger scale if he goes after his debt in the courts.