Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
I think so yeah. I'm sure most agree that everyone who puts themselves in the public discourse should be able to be scrutinized.

And equally a politician who receives payment for an area of expertise isn't necessarily corrupt.

These are pretty uncontroversial statements so glad to see you coming round to them.
I didn't actually say Thunberg shouldn't be scrutinised?

Nor did I say, the MP was corrupt?

I asked a question about what you thought should be the priority or perhaps level of scrutiny?

Carry on though, you're amusing me. I like the way your fitting your narrative to your self delusion. It's a gift really.

It's scrutinised not scrutinized by the way old bean. Bloody American dictionary.