+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
You may right , but more and more of this data is being reported , if it was wildly inaccurate it would not be published would it ?
I would imagine the statistics for flu would 40% higher if they tested it in the same way ?
Is this all connected to the 'with covid' or 'of covid' data discrepancies?
Unlike all of the other UK right leaning newspapers I believe, Wikipedia does not treat the Daily Mail as a reliable source - the piece linked would be much more convincing I feel if it had come from a source which doesn’t have the sort of agenda the Mail does when it comes to Covid.
You lose all credibility if you post a link from the daily mail.
What about the ONS or the Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ut-not-by-much
I just think some people are trying their hardest to squeeze the pips out of this story because they have a certain agenda. For me there's far more urgent priorities to address.
No agenda from me , just an alternative view which is healthy I’d say when you consider how the last two years have impacted mental health , delayed treatment for serious Illness , dentistry , not to mention the economic crash which is probably never going to recover. On a positive note , at least stories like these are slowly dripping through when it was known by many after about three weeks in. Science is always about debate and risk/benefits.