Quote Originally Posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
I think you're asking whether 163 people going blind warrants the inclusion of that word, which wasn't mine but whoever wrote that headline.

I do though believe it to be justified because we were informed endlessly the jabs were safe and effective. Not overwhelmingly, mostly or anything else to qualify what were presented as indisputable facts.

In Yankland there's currently 27 thousand jab deaths and, if memory serves, 45 thousand in the EU (along with 1.5 million adverse reactions, half of which have been classified as serious).

As a reference point, the Swine Flu vaccine rolled out in the States in the mid-1970s were pulled completely by their FDA after 56 deaths. How times change.
About 50 million Brits have had at least two doses. 163 is obviously a tiny percentage of that.

But it also seems like a small number of people to go blind in the UK over a year. What is the annual average number? I would have guessed it's higher than that. Could the vaccines have the unexpected side effect of preventing blindness?