Quote Originally Posted by Lawnmower View Post
Recently collections for the food banks, Ukraine,

Campaign for safe standing

They produce a magazine.

The Trust chairman produces the best financial analysis of our clubs accounts every year.

Helped with the March against racism

Raised money for the disabled supporters transport

Helped improve the memorial garden

They did have the occasional meeting with the club until theses were stopped.

Let’s face it apart from Dalman’s half hearted interviews full of contradiction and inaccuracies we are totally in the dark as to what’s going on. TBH I don’t think he’s that informed either .

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I really care about this club and want to know what the owners ( who themselves tell us are merely ‘custodians’ for the fans) plans are- as we haven’t got a clue .
Top post.

The Trust’s open letter was clumsily written but the intent and the message was spot on.

I have been a Trust member from the start and really appreciate the unpaid and seemingly unvalued work that is put in by a small number of elected representatives. I should do more myself - but that feels difficult living over 200 miles from the stadium.

The club’s response is poor on every level. No attempt to respond to the contents and a brush off based on personal abuse and dismissing the Trust’s status - despite engaging with the Trust up to last year. There will be some happy clappy customers but otherwise it reads like another own goal.

That said I would like to know more about the club claims about the Trust status with the organisations it quoted and the reason for the breakdown in relationships last year.

The Trust is not in a strong position but it needs to come out with a response to the club statement - positive and respectful, but maintaining the challenge to Vincent Tan to improve governance and communication.