Ah. Still not letting go of Deagal I see. We've debunked it several times but worth another shot.

The Deagal figures which first appeared in 2008 get mysteriously updated as time moves on and they become factually pants. They stopped predicting 2017 when that became obvious and moved forward to 2025. This is the 2016 prediction for the US for 2025. You may recognise it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170827...ica_c0001.aspx

Here are the intermediate predictions and the actual results.

Prediction Date Prediction Year Population Actual
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 2008 2017 323 million(1) 325.7 million
------------------ END 2017 PREDICTIONS --------------------------------------
April 2009 2020 271 million 331.0 million
April 2010 2020 264 million 331.0 million
August 2011 2020 248 million 331.0 million
------------------ END 2020 PREDICTIONS --------------------------------------
June 2012 2025 187 million
May 2013 2025 182 million
July 2014 2025 88 million(2)
October 2014 2025 69 million(3)
August 2015 2025 65 million
October 2016 2025 61 million
August 2017 2025 54 million
May 2018 2025 100 million(4)
August 2020 2025 100 million(5)(6)

Dates and Predictions of Note
-----------------------------
(1: This is the only prediction where the population increases from the current count)

(2: First recorded instance where the prediction is sub-100 million.)

(3: Note explaining their predictions first appears on the bottom of the page)

(4: First recorded instance where the prediction has gone up from a previous prediction)

(5: Deagel.com goes through a UI overhaul, and the note mentioned in the question and referenced in note 3 of this chart disappears for unknown reasons)

(6: Current prediction as of 24 August 2020)

Here is the website explaining that it's all bullshit!

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/q...25-legit/39380

Yet, just like Putin's Lotus Flower/Square and Compass Robe you keep pouring out this rubbish long after it is shown to be just that.

Why?