+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
13 primaries last night of which 12 backed Trump candidates won ...
Why would a republican member of Congress deny taking people on a tour of the capitol the day before the attempted coup, then say it was only a tour for families with kids, then say it was only a tour of 16 people?
And why was someone on the tour taking photos of tunnel entrances and police checkpoints?
Probably all a big coincidence!
Posters who enjoy doing their own research can write the fun name "Barry Loudermilk" into their favoured search engine.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61834957
He makes Boris Johnson look like a selfless Samaritan.
this is what he said
The latest person to discover that loyalty is a one way street with Trumpy
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...rdons-1371419/
This may well be the day that the House of Trump begins to crumple.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...trump-00042779
But this is the man you spent years telling us was fighting the good fight against the elites, so are you now saying that you backed what happened on 6 January last year and that the VP Mike Pence should have been hung by those Trump followers? You’ve told us for years what you’re against, but never what, or who, you’re for - Trump apart of course.
It seems that the people who worked in, or have inside knowledge of, Trump's White House around this time fall into one of two groups. Either they think his actions were criminal or they don't.
Everyone who has spoken under oath and threat of perjury so far belongs in just one of those groups.
I'm just an MSM Sheeple so I can't figure it out, but we have some critical thinkers who love doing their own research on this board.
So perhaps they can answer the question: which group are the ones who have spoken under oath in?
We love balance on this board so let's check in on Fox for the other side. Surely they'll have a few ripostes.
This post-hearing moment of awkward silence on Fox kinda says a lot. pic.twitter.com/5yRNJ0btKd
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) June 28, 2022
Thoroughly convincing
"Whack job ... I won't say why that she's not good, but plenty of reasons" -- Trump makes all sorts of weird insinuations about Cassidy Hutchinson during a new Newsmax interview pic.twitter.com/Hpwr37n2Wr
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 30, 2022
Murdoch papers turning on Trump.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...urnal-fox-news
Rupert Murdoch, hitherto one of Donald Trump’s most loyal media messengers, appears to have turned on the former president.
US media circles were rocked this weekend after the New York Post issued an excoriating editorial indictment of Trump’s failure to stop the attack on the US Capitol on 6 January 2021.
The editorial, in a tabloid owned by Murdoch since 1976, began: “As his followers stormed the Capitol, calling for his vice-president to be hanged, President Donald Trump sat in his private dining room, watching TV, doing nothing. For three hours, seven minutes.”
Trump’s only focus, the Post said, was to block the peaceful transfer of power.
“As a matter of principle, as a matter of character, Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again.”
The Wall Street Journal, another Murdoch paper, issued a similar critique in which it said evidence before the House January 6 committee was a reminder that “Trump betrayed his supporters”.
What part of that post had any bearing on whether or not there was collaboration between Trump and Russia?
It was about Rupert Murdoch (maybe like Putin?) deciding that Trump is no longer his useful idiot.
For someone who was having a pop at Delmbox just now in another thread for his single-minded refusal to let Organ get away with just one of his manic claims, you are demonstrating an even greater and longer running fixation - and one of no interest or relevance to anyone but you.
And the lack of self-awareness while you do it.....
So, anyone who thinks Donald Trump is an egotistical, self absorbed, corrupt, lying, misogynistic, racist disgrace of a man is wrong because they were mistaken about whether he colluded with Russia (at least Gluey thinks they were mistaken) or not.