Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Player ratings according to WOL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Player ratings according to WOL

    Ryan Allsop 9
    Mahlon Romeo 8
    Perry Ng 6
    Cedric Kipre 9 (star man)
    Jamilu Collins 9
    Ryan Wintle 9
    Andy Rinomhota 8
    Romaine Sawyers 8
    Sheyi Ojo 8
    Max Watters 7
    Callum O'Dowda 8

    SUBS

    Joe Ralls (Sawyers 60) 7
    Mark Harris (Watters 60) 7
    Curtis Nelson (Ojo 74) 7
    Gavin Whyte (O'Dowda 81) NA
    Tom Sang (Rinomhota 81) NA



    Personally I think some are 1 too high and Whyte should have had a 4

    Great win

  • #2
    Re: Player ratings according to WOL

    I thought Allsop played very well, made a great save, safe hands but when we stopped playing from the back his kicking was pretty poor.

    No way was O'Dowda worth an 8.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Player ratings according to WOL

      Originally posted by NYCBlue View Post
      I thought Allsop played very well, made a great save, safe hands but when we stopped playing from the back his kicking was pretty poor.

      No way was O'Dowda worth an 8.
      I thought O'Dowda was excellent. My MOM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Player ratings according to WOL

        Originally posted by NYCBlue View Post
        I thought Allsop played very well, made a great save, safe hands but when we stopped playing from the back his kicking was pretty poor.

        No way was O'Dowda worth an 8.
        Originally posted by Garth Blue View Post
        I thought O'Dowda was excellent. My MOM.

        These 2 things are connected.

        Allsop’s kicks were finding O’ Dowda out on the touch line.

        When O’Dowda went off, Allsop’s kicks we’re going straight into touch

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Player ratings according to WOL

          Kipre was very impressive as was Collins, but for me, Wintle was MOM

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Player ratings according to WOL

            Originally posted by Garth Blue View Post
            I thought O'Dowda was excellent. My MOM.
            I thought he played really well and his cut inside set up Sawyers shot didn’t it? His off the ball work was good to watch.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Player ratings according to WOL

              Originally posted by BLUETIT View Post
              These 2 things are connected.

              Allsop’s kicks were finding O’ Dowda out on the touch line.

              When O’Dowda went off, Allsop’s kicks we’re going straight into touch
              O'Dowda was impressive as far as I'm concerned but Allsopp, who was excellent defensively, was poor with his kicking. Plenty of time to improve.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                O’Dowda and Romeo were two signings I wasn’t fussed on and didn’t see much in preseason to change my mind.

                Thought both were great yesterday.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                  (also completely agree that a few of those ratings need to come down a point)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                    Don't like singling one player out, but, for me, Ojo was the same frustrating mix he was two seasons ago - some good stuff, but a lot of cheap concessions of possession in a team which appears to value that commodity so much higher than previous ones did.

                    I'll give Ojo come company by saying that Whyte almost cost us twice in a few seconds late on with the sort of skill levels associated with our teams from recent seasons.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                      Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                      Don't like singling one player out, but, for me, Ojo was the same frustrating mix he was two seasons ago - some good stuff, but a lot of cheap concessions of possession in a team which appears to value that commodity so much higher than previous ones did.

                      I'll give Ojo come company by saying that Whyte almost cost us twice in a few seconds late on with the sort of skill levels associated with our teams from recent seasons.
                      I know what you're saying ToBW but I liked that Ojo was trying stuff at the top end of the pitch. Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't. It felt more like creative risks worth taking than now-they-have-the-ball-and-are-gonna-score. That's probably because I like this midfield a lot more. I never felt in danger when Ojo lost the ball.

                      Whyte on the other hand...

                      I was happy to see him given a chance in a big spot after a decent-ish preseason. Five minutes later I was wondering why it wasn't Tanner instead.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                        Surprised to see Whyte on the bench let alone the pitch. He’s still the player of two seasons ago with limited end product and limited passing. He panics and just hoofs

                        One thing I think I noticed about a couple of our players….

                        I thought a few of times our players got caught out waiting for the ball to come to them and it getting intercepted - a typical left over from a low quality pre season so hopefully there is more ability to keep the ball as they progress, in which case whyte will stand out more

                        Watters was as frustrating as ever. No matter what style we play - it doesn’t seem to suit him. Yes he was isolated but he made runs to the wrong side of defenders, runs into dead ends and seemed to hate playing with his back to goal. Roll on a striker or two

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                          Originally posted by Q View Post
                          Surprised to see Whyte on the bench let alone the pitch. He’s still the player of two seasons ago with limited end product and limited passing. He panics and just hoofs
                          He didn't do this AT ALL in preseason :shrug:

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                            Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                            Don't like singling one player out, but, for me, Ojo was the same frustrating mix he was two seasons ago - some good stuff, but a lot of cheap concessions of possession in a team which appears to value that commodity so much higher than previous ones did.

                            I'll give Ojo come company by saying that Whyte almost cost us twice in a few seconds late on with the sort of skill levels associated with our teams from recent seasons.
                            Very poetic, TOBW

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Player ratings according to WOL

                              There were 3 or 4 players that would have a shout for MOTM, I was impressed by Collins making his debut let's hope it's a sign of things to come.
                              Ojo was frustrating but when he lost the ball it didn't put us under pressure.
                              Watters playing the lone striker role is a difficult one, it's a tough ask but theres lots for him to work on if he's going to be successful in this formation.
                              Harris at least looked lively when he came on, but I don't either of them are the real answer.
                              The Mark's might be a little high, but overall it was a very good game to watch in comparison to some of the real dross we endured over the last couple of years

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X