Quote Originally Posted by dml1954 View Post
A golden example of criticism just for the sake of it. You obviously didn't watch the game properly, if at all.
I watched the game. All of it. Properly. With my eyes. As is the way.
I wasn't criticising anybody. I thought every player on the pitch put in a good shift and played well. I responded "no" to the movement question because I did not see as many slick attacking runs from Watters as I have previously. But maybe it was not that sort of a game. And he more than made up for it in other ways as has been described well by others.
My main point was simply questioning (not criticising) the number of crosses that go into the box when we don't have the right type of strikers to get on the end of them. I was just saying maybe it would be better to play it back infield and go through the centre more and/or hit some shots on target.