Oxford Vaccine

[goats]

It’s hardly an obsession, but you’ve referred to what you said on here two and a half years ago and it seems odd that you don’t want anyone to see what you were saying for themselves.

Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid

[TWGL1]

It’s hardly an obsession, but you’ve referred to what you said on here two and a half years ago and it seems odd that you don’t want anyone to see what you were saying for themselves.

I used to view the message-board as I’ve told you, can I ask why you are so concerned about me when clearly there are hundreds if not thousands of new accounts on here, it seems odd that you are only concerned about me.

You can add me of Facebook if you want

[TWGL1]

Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid

You’re a bit cheeky mate….. if you’re referring to me ?

[Wales-Bales]

See if it was just conspiratorial stuff like that I'd have just left it straight away and moved on

It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.

[Dorcus]

I just wonder if this is really worth posting. We had a pandemic, get over it, we move on. If it comes again we do the same, we protect the elderly sick and vulnerable: common sense, no big deal

[Dorcus]

Which fruit loop was he before? I dont pay enough attention to be honest, I only tend to notice when real sick mo foes like Lither come along…think this site def attracts a fair few weirdos since covid

I think Lither is officially licking his wounds after being on the receiving end of a punishment beating by the board.

Unofficially, I wonder if he's trying to emerge from his shell and into the open .....al fresco sort of if you get my gist.

[jon1959]

It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.

That was just what was needed when the NHS was about to collapse with wards full, staff exhausted and new Covid patients stacked up in ambulances or taxis outside hospitals. Just hold on for 5 or 10 years whilst we check out some of the lesser side effects!

[TWGL1]

I just wonder if this is really worth posting. We had a pandemic, get over it, we move on. If it comes again we do the same, we protect the elderly sick and vulnerable: common sense, no big deal

If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.

What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.

[superfeathers]

It's hardly conspiratorial stuff when mRNA products have never been used on humans before. Normal vaccine development typically takes between 5 to 10 years and sometimes longer, in order to assess whether a vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.

See, I’m not even remotely interested in engaging with this because clearly it’s someone with strong views, albeit views I think are mental. Obviously we’ve heard all this sort of stuff continually and it goes into a rabbit hole where insanity lies.

The original post on the other hand just seemed so odd!

[superfeathers]

If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.

What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.

Which do you dislike the most if you had to choose? :
Lockdowns
Vaccines that stopped lockdowns
Vaccine boosters that continued to prevent lockdowns
Recent news
Leo fortune west

[Canton Kev]

If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.

What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.

Because people understood that at the time it was the solution that made sense. How do you propose we protected the sick and vulnerable back in early 2020?

[Organ Morgan.]

See, I’m not even remotely interested in engaging with this because clearly it’s someone with strong views, albeit views I think are mental. Obviously we’ve heard all this sort of stuff continually and it goes into a rabbit hole where insanity lies.

The original post on the other hand just seemed so odd!

Presuming your reply was serious, just what was insane about what he wrote?

This is Fauci speaking in 1999 about the grave dangers of introducing a new vaccine too quickly.

[TWGL1]

Because people understood that at the time it was the solution that made sense. How do you propose we protected the sick and vulnerable back in early 2020?

I dont get paid to make those decisions however, I would have followed Sweden’s pathway if I wanted to please the majority of the population, and let the rest make their own risk assessment, knowing full well they would only suffer mild to moderate symptoms akin to many other coronaviruses

[Canton Kev]

Presuming your reply was serious, just what was insane about what he wrote?

This is Fauci speaking in 1999 about the grave dangers of introducing a new vaccine too quickly.

An 18 second clip from 23 years ago talking about a different disease entirely.

Damning evidence Fauci is part of the "plandemic" no doubt.

[Organ Morgan.]

An 18 second clip from 23 years ago talking about a different disease entirely.

Damning evidence Fauci is part of the "plandemic" no doubt.

Let me guess, you're another one who was daft enough to place your faith in Pfizer, because - and I'm speculating here - you were far too busy to spare 10 minutes of your precious time researching that company's egregious business practices.

Here's but one example: Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing - https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justi...nt-its-history

[superfeathers]

Presuming your reply was serious, just what was insane about what he wrote?

This is Fauci speaking in 1999 about the grave dangers of introducing a new vaccine too quickly.

Fauci advocates getting vaccinated against covid but you’d rather watch a video from 2009 about something else

Makes sense

[Organ Morgan.]

Fauci advocates getting vaccinated against covid but you’d rather watch a video from 2009 about something else

Makes sense

In 1999 he was very aware how carefully a new vaccine must be introduced for its effects to be studied over a number of years. He abandoned that reasoning in 2020. Now he advocates giving it to those as young as six months old for an alleged disease that has contributed to the deaths of fewer than 1 per every thousand of the world's population in almost three years.

[Canton Kev]

Let me guess, you're another one who was daft enough to place your faith in Pfizer, because - and I'm speculating here - you were far too busy to spare 10 minutes of your precious time researching that company's egregious business practices.

Here's but one example: Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History
Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing - https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justi...nt-its-history

Let me guess. You trust Fauci in that 18 second clip. But not once over the past 2.5 years because he’s an agent of the Great Reset?

You believe your 10 minutes of research are worth more than the countless tens of thousands of top healthcare officials from countries all across the world that have both extensive and first hand experience in the development of the vaccine and have vouched for its effectiveness and safety.

Of course all of their knowledge is instantly inadmissible because the corporate marketing wing of Pfizer broke the law in 2005.

That’s like blaming Puma for the rebrand because they made the red kits.

[Organ Morgan.]

Every fan of depopulation was extremely eager for people to volunteer for what they promoted was a life saving injection. Why would they - isn't that counter-intuitive? Shouldn't they have instead warned of the dangers of taking something that had no long-term safety data so that more would die to ease the strain on the earth's depleting resources that they also say they care so deeply about?

I was suspicious of the prevailing narrative because of what's above, and a great deal more so when it became plain that politicians in alliance with corporate media and health authorities were deliberately concealing the fact that the manufacturers of their 'safe and effective' products demanded, and were granted, complete immunity from court proceedings for any deaths or injuries which resulted from volunteering for a jab.

That strategy was so effective that I've still yet to speak to a volunteer who was aware Pfizer and co enjoyed total indemnity.

By doing so they were in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code which emphasises the protocol of informed consent, and they remain so because Moderna does as well for this latest shot in the UK.

[Wales-Bales]

That was just what was needed when the NHS was about to collapse with wards full, staff exhausted and new Covid patients stacked up in ambulances or taxis outside hospitals. Just hold on for 5 or 10 years whilst we check out some of the lesser side effects!

I was there during the darkest hours and it was quite an experience.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

I don’t think having booster after booster is effective especially when most of the healthy population have antibodies.( I’m excluding the obese and people with underlying health issues)

Thanks for you thoughts. I know a professor of tropical diseases, a senior doctor who is heavily involved in things Covid, two retired GP's, a senior nurse who ran a Covid ward, a trainee nurse who have worked on Covid wards and another nurse who specialises in viruses - and none of them go along with the conspiracy theorists on here.

[Canton Kev]

I dont get paid to make those decisions however, I would have followed Sweden’s pathway if I wanted to please the majority of the population, and let the rest make their own risk assessment, knowing full well they would only suffer mild to moderate symptoms akin to many other coronaviruses

Compared to Finland and Norway, the 2 most similar countries to Sweden, Covid was much worse for Sweden than their neighbours.

Their death rate is double that of Finland and triple that of Norway’s.

[Wales-Bales]

Thanks for you thoughts. I know a professor of tropical diseases, a senior doctor who is heavily involved in things Covid, two retired GP's, a senior nurse who ran a Covid ward, a trainee nurse who have worked on Covid wards and another nurse who specialises in viruses - and none of them go along with the conspiracy theorists on here.

Now it's turning into a who's got the biggest cock contest I know professors of epidemiology at Oxford, Harvard and Stanford who disagree with your nurses.

[Dorcus]

If it came again , we protect the sick and the vulnerable, nobody’s disputing that as far as I’m aware.

What I disagree with is the fact they locked people down who didn’t need to have their freedoms curtailed and people were happy with that, clearly it’s a big deal.

**** freedom!

[Clandestine]

I know a binman a brickie a hooker and a bookie none of them has taken the #clotshot
each of them wanting to live to an age where they get to see their grandchildren.


For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest,
neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad
GOD Wins
Clandestine