Musk buying Twitter (again)

[Wales-Bales]

According to the latest court filings.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...pp/ar-AA12CV1Q

https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...itter-deal-buy

[Clandestine]

RED OCTOBER

[Canton Kev]

RED OCTOBER

Shubmerge the Shubmarine mishter helmshman

[JamesWales]

Not really a fan of twitter, although it is useful for keeping up with instant news and gossip.

I think he has a point on some free speech issues. What I think is more key is the issue of algorithms. I notice this more on facebook, where posts just aren't displayed in any order and groups 'that you may be interested in' get pushed upon you.

We saw that most tragically with poor old Molly Russell. I think you multiply this by hundreds of millions of people and you can see how sites like twitter definitely contribute to division by steering people towards opinions and groups they are aligned to, so there is less diversity of opinion all round. If Musk can address some of that, it'll be a good thing

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...est-hears.html

[TWGL1]

Elon Musk: Russia and Ukraine must agree to a peace agreement to stop the war

Russia: "Agree"

Ukraine: We don't agree, we want more US / UK taxpayer money.

[Clandestine]

When analyzing the Twitter/Elon situation, you cannot look at it from a purely business/monetary perspective. Nothing will make sense.

This is not a random billionaire buying another company for fun. This is the US MIL’s highest paid contractor stripping the Deep State of one of their most powerful brainwashing weapons in The Information War.

It’s never been about money. It’s an operation to expose and neutralize a psychological weapon.

The state of things:
1. Elon to Twitter: "I bought stock in Twitter."
2. {Yawn, both eyes closed}
3. "I bought a lot."
4. {one eye opens}
5. "I bought enough to be a board member"
6. (Twitter, alarmed) "You can't!"
7. Elon: "I want to buy the whole company"
8. Twitter: "you CAN'T!!!"
9. Elon: here's my bid
10. Twitter: We hate it
11. Twitter shareholders: We like it
12. Twitter: OK fine
13. Elon: Too many bots. I'm out.
14. Twitter: You can't not buy us!
15. Elon: sue me
16. Twitter: OK
17. Twitter: you MUST buy us
18. Elon: No
19. Twitter: We insist
20. Elon: OK
21. Twitter: "You can't buy us!"

-Clandestine

[delmbox]

When analyzing the Twitter/Elon situation, you cannot look at it from a purely business/monetary perspective. Nothing will make sense.

This is not a random billionaire buying another company for fun. This is the US MIL’s highest paid contractor stripping the Deep State of one of their most powerful brainwashing weapons in The Information War.

It’s never been about money. It’s an operation to expose and neutralize a psychological weapon.

The state of things:
1. Elon to Twitter: "I bought stock in Twitter."
2. {Yawn, both eyes closed}
3. "I bought a lot."
4. {one eye opens}
5. "I bought enough to be a board member"
6. (Twitter, alarmed) "You can't!"
7. Elon: "I want to buy the whole company"
8. Twitter: "you CAN'T!!!"
9. Elon: here's my bid
10. Twitter: We hate it
11. Twitter shareholders: We like it
12. Twitter: OK fine
13. Elon: Too many bots. I'm out.
14. Twitter: You can't not buy us!
15. Elon: sue me
16. Twitter: OK
17. Twitter: you MUST buy us
18. Elon: No
19. Twitter: We insist
20. Elon: OK
21. Twitter: "You can't buy us!"

-Clandestine

Wow, that seems like a big spoke in the wheels of the great reset, Schwab's really ****ed this one up

[Wales-Bales]

Not really a fan of twitter, although it is useful for keeping up with instant news and gossip.

I think he has a point on some free speech issues. What I think is more key is the issue of algorithms. I notice this more on facebook, where posts just aren't displayed in any order and groups 'that you may be interested in' get pushed upon you.

We saw that most tragically with poor old Molly Russell. I think you multiply this by hundreds of millions of people and you can see how sites like twitter definitely contribute to division by steering people towards opinions and groups they are aligned to, so there is less diversity of opinion all round. If Musk can address some of that, it'll be a good thing

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...est-hears.html

It appears that Twitter may have been colluding with the White House to silence opposition voices on their platform, thereby denying them their First Amendment right of free speech. I wonder if any other social media companies have been playing the same game?

[life on mars]

Love the Musk..

https://www.voanews.com/a/how-elon-m...a/6641210.html

[Citizen's Nephew]

Shubmerge the Shubmarine mishter helmshman

very good! You sound just like him.

[Doucas]

It appears that Twitter may have been colluding with the White House to silence opposition voices on their platform, thereby denying them their First Amendment right of free speech. I wonder if any other social media companies have been playing the same game?

Source?

[MOZZER2]

Elon Musk is under Federal Investigation over conduct related the Twitter deal

[Wales-Bales]

twitter-Yoel-Roth-1-Elon-Musk-1.jpg

[Wales-Bales]

Source?

https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1587102997317722113

https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/...formation-dhs/

[Wales-Bales]

When analyzing the Twitter/Elon situation, you cannot look at it from a purely business/monetary perspective. Nothing will make sense.

This is not a random billionaire buying another company for fun. This is the US MIL’s highest paid contractor stripping the Deep State of one of their most powerful brainwashing weapons in The Information War.

It’s never been about money. It’s an operation to expose and neutralize a psychological weapon.

The state of things:
1. Elon to Twitter: "I bought stock in Twitter."
2. {Yawn, both eyes closed}
3. "I bought a lot."
4. {one eye opens}
5. "I bought enough to be a board member"
6. (Twitter, alarmed) "You can't!"
7. Elon: "I want to buy the whole company"
8. Twitter: "you CAN'T!!!"
9. Elon: here's my bid
10. Twitter: We hate it
11. Twitter shareholders: We like it
12. Twitter: OK fine
13. Elon: Too many bots. I'm out.
14. Twitter: You can't not buy us!
15. Elon: sue me
16. Twitter: OK
17. Twitter: you MUST buy us
18. Elon: No
19. Twitter: We insist
20. Elon: OK
21. Twitter: "You can't buy us!"

-Clandestine

https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...hat-about-then

[life on mars]

Source?

Google It ..
Since taking it on it appears Musk has found the truth

[Wales-Bales]

Google It ..
Since taking it on it appears Musk has found the truth

What has come out is only the tip of the iceberg. I'm not sure about Musk, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt until his actions prove otherwise.

[Wales-Bales]

https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1587102997317722113

https://theintercept.com/2022/10/31/...formation-dhs/

The First Amendment bars the government from deciding for us what is true or false, online or anywhere.

Our government can’t use private pressure to get around our constitutional rights.

- ACLU

https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/158719847960830362203

[Doucas]

He spent years crying about 'free speech'. Now he's banning anyone who impersonates him.

He's a massive hypocrite.

[Canton Kev]

Comedian Kathy Griffin suspended from Twitter after mocking CEO Elon Musk

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...musk-rcna55916

So begins this new era of free speech

[Wales-Bales]

Comedian Kathy Griffin suspended from Twitter after mocking CEO Elon Musk

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...musk-rcna55916

So begins this new era of free speech

A wrong move by Musk, but I've always thought he's up to something.

[Citizen's Nephew]

A wrong move by Musk, but I've always thought he's up to something.

...you think everybody's up to something!

[Wales-Bales]

...you think everybody's up to something!

Not really, things are either true, false, or indeterminate, and Musk resides in the latter category for me. Don't confuse questioning something with believing something.

[Doucas]

lol

[Doucas]

The defender of 'free speech' strikes again - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2382525.html