| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I just WhatsApped him. He replied:Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Matt Hancock
Many people weren't scared, so you must have been getting your information from scary news sources
I had the pleasure of getting to know David through his campaigning on assisted dying
— Matt Hancock (@MattHancock) February 28, 2023
He was a kind, brave and truly inspirational man whose spirit will live on through this campaign
My thoughts are with his family and friends at this difficult timehttps://t.co/9NmWhc7ed0
WhatsApp1.jpg
https://youtu.be/sv0dQfRRrEQ
Think many on here could do with watching this. How Republicans turned against the vaccine.
In short, you're being ****ing morons.
A few folk feel having the Vaccine has adversely effected their overall health , who knows as its early doors , like most new vaccines the story of how it effects ones body will surely be known in the future ..
Boris clearly was clearly overruled when it came to locking down healthy people as they were not at risk at all.
They knew it , lots of people knew it , yet they still went ahead with it.
More worryingly ,he can’t even do simple arithmetic.
Many more folk feel having Covid has adversely "effected" (sic) their overall health too funnily enough. Like most new viruses the story of how it "effects" (sic) one's body longer term will surely be known in the future.
My wife had bronchitis as a child, she still suffers now from it
Thank goodness she didn't catch Covid with it.
She did , we all did more than once but it didn’t effect us fortunately.
No one knew it for sure in March 2020.Boris clearly was clearly overruled when it came to locking down healthy people as they were not at risk at all.
They knew it , lots of people knew it , yet they still went ahead with it.
More worryingly ,he can’t even do simple arithmetic.
Oh, hello TWGL. Nice of you to acknowledge me again. I do hope that this isn't a one-offBoris clearly was clearly overruled when it came to locking down healthy people as they were not at risk at all.
They knew it , lots of people knew it , yet they still went ahead with it.
More worryingly ,he can’t even do simple arithmetic.
We were all told the risks of mortality for healthy people catching Covid during the start of Covid. That isn't news.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-51674743
Most of us followed the rules because we wanted to protect the vulnerable in society who were far more at risk than ourselves.
Why is that such a foreign concept to you?
We all know that Boris Johnson is a libertarian and didn't want lockdowns. He said as much when he pushed for herd mentality on national TV and privately said "let the bodies pile high".
Boris Johnson being your moral compass would make sense at this juncture.
I'd also like to add that it's a bit rich of you to point out his numeric faux pas.
You've made simple mistakes when it comes to basic sums when you thought that you had uncovered a Covid conspiracy about the efficacy of masks
I do hope that you call again soon. Don't be a stranger.
Oh, hello TWGL. Nice of you to acknowledge me again. I do hope that this isn't a one-off
We were all told the risks of mortality for healthy people catching Covid during the start of Covid. That isn't news.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-51674743
Most of us followed the rules because we wanted to protect the vulnerable in society who were far more at risk than ourselves.
Why is that such a foreign concept to you?
We all know that Boris Johnson is a libertarian and didn't want lockdowns. He said as much when he pushed for herd mentality on national TV and privately said "let the bodies pile high".
Boris Johnson being your moral compass would make sense at this juncture.
I'd also like to add that it's a bit rich of you to point out his numeric faux pas.
You've made simple mistakes when it comes to basic sums when you thought that you had uncovered a Covid conspiracy about the efficacy of masks
I do hope that you call again soon. Don't be a stranger.
You have your opinion, I have mine , and that’s what the whole point of this board is about isn’t it.
As long as you dont get overly personal that’s fine as well. You don’t know me , or my personal circumstances either do you, and if you do feel the necessity of getting personal (towards me ) take a step back before posting.- don’t take advantage of your anonymity-
Thanks
I always post my opinion but can also back them up with facts if it's necessary.
That's where we differ as posters on here.
As for knowing you and your circumstances. What has that got to do with anything?
You should realise that you post a lot of personal information on here though. Enough to get a basic understanding of who you are as a person.
Unless it's all fabricated, of course.
You’re making a snapshot judgment on who I am based on comments I make on here which clearly you don’t agree with.
People who know me , know my views , and clearly I wouldn’t be sat around a table with you would I?
Sometimes , it’s best not to reply , mainly as it gets out of hand.
Hold on a second. Are you saying that you don't post your views on here? Are your "opinions" not your views?
Possibility, but the CMO said during this time that most would have mild to moderate symptoms.
It was highly infectious. It still is but now we have vaccines.
Even if only 10% of the country had it at any one time, and most only had moderate symptoms at worse, and a small percentage had it bad enough to be hospitalised or require a ventilator - that would be far above what the health service could cope with.
A small percentage of millions of people is still a destructively large number in hospital bed terms.
Well put Lardy
And yet they put thousands in care homes untested ….. hmmmmmmm
Hmmmmm
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote