Originally Posted by
JamesWales
It's an interesting grand theory, and I do respect that different people think different things, but why do you think that people who are concerned are 'stirred up' by things, which presumably you are immune to with your concerns?
There are legit questions about the legality, practicalities of removal, moral position etc, but surely you can accept that people are allowed to be unhappy about the cost of this, the queue jumping element, the organised crime, the perceived injustice of housing people when we have homeless, the impact on generally poorer communities, the impact of closed hotels etc?
I mean, even if you don't support the govts policy (I do, but it's fair if you don't), surely you can recognise people have legitimate concerns?