+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
naughty boy in front of the headmaster, he's above the law, thinks he can do anything. let the people decide who did obey the guidelines, no remorse......
Clearly broke the rules as did most of the Country, it was stupid, he should have known better.
It is plain daft to call them parties, they were gatherings, but still, against the rules, he was very stupid to say one thing and then do another, without banning cameras and swearing people to silence and making sure they were not fully covered up, but he probably thought it would never get out, which is also very daft.
Of course, it is blown out of all proportion though, more than half the Country broke one rule or another, including previous people commenting pretending to be holier than thou!
I think anyone facing questions for three and half hours knowing they want him hung deserves to lose it, I'd rather call it tetchy as it should be, he answered the questions and defended his view in detail whatever one thinks is right and wrong.
I think he and was badly advised on all matters..as no one had been through this before.
And that guidance is what it's about did he miss lead if he simply read his guidance believing it to be true ( at the time)
Did he see parties, was he at all of them was he deceived and badly advised are the questions.??
Was he under pressure that no one has experienced since WW1/WW2.??
Did he feckup??
Did he do well at times during pandemic??
Do folk want him done no matter what?
Did anyone really nail him as guilty in my view it's a no
I think the charge he faces are inconclusive.. This is simply about what he said to parliament , did he believe what he said, did he purposely device them at the time I can't see how one can really determine what one believes in their own mind as we see it in so many different ways.. He believes it was a workplace and for him a home??
PS : The 100mph question was poor one as he wasn't there. Harriet who I respect was poor. Lovely big beads though...
Not if they never broke a single rule, traveling five miles, meeting a mate quietly etc, but they are very few unless they were terrified at the time, or very ill and scared to have any normality.
Some of the rules were pathetic and way over the top. In truth, I don't think there are many people who were fit and healthy, and under sixty that didn't break one single rule. You could go to work, but you couldn't see a mate outside?
"Agile as a cat"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...lear-name.html
The Daily Star has a different point of view.
https://twitter.com/TmorrowsPapers/s...924608/photo/1
what about Sir Bier , was that an event, was it a workplace , who was there , were police commissionaires their , who was outside in range rover , were his personal security folk involved their , no it was a with a pause for food lol and drink , and a lot of it late at night , in someone's else premises , maybe Durham police ran out of PNE's , I thought the Met were bad but they issued 80 PNE's Durham labour controlled police would have issue fixing my clothes line ??
When are you going to stop annoying us and fix that bloody missing "K" character on your keyboard?
You may not be aware of this but a "bier" is a form of stretcher for transporting the dead. In the current circumstances and politically speaking it would be much more appropriate for you to refer to your twattish mate as 'Bier' Johnson
Genuine question - what is a PNE?
I have ticked off Preston North End, Personal Navigation Assistant, Professional Nurse Advocate, Peptide Nucleic Acid and half a dozen more, and none of them seem relevant to Durham Police or Covid fixed penalty notices.
With or without beer bottles. With or without a random apostrophe.