Originally Posted by
Eric the Half a Bee
We played 18 league games under Lamouchi, 17 under Hudson.
Points per game
Lamouchi - 1.11
Hudson - 1.06
Win percentage
Lamouchi - 33%
Hudson - 24%
Defeat percentage
Lamouchi - 56%
Hudson - 41%
Goals scored average
Lamouchi - 1.11
Hudson - 0.82
Failed to score
Lamouchi - 33%
Hudson - 41%
Goals conceded average
Lamouchi - 1.5
Hudson - 1.11
Clean sheets
Lamouchi - 17%
Hudson - 29%
I doubt many would say we were worse under Lamouchi overall than we were under Hudson. Statistically we were marginally better in terms of points and we scored a few more goals. All this came at a cost of us being far worse defensively, where we even managed to lose more games under Lamouchi than we did with Hudson.
Nobody can say that Lamouchi was a great improvement on Hudson, either. Similar records, same team (roughly). If someone thought Hudson was a disaster then Lamouchi was slightly less of a disaster. If someone thought Lamouchi did a good job, then Hudson did almost as good a job.